Don't need distraction
Yes, although it's a different case from Miami, which did the necessary thing in taking itself out of bowl consideration as part of a damage-control strategy. Current Miami players were involved in the Nevin Shapiro scandal.
Penn State players had nothing to do with the Jerry Sandusky case. But several members of the coaching staff, including interim head coach Tom Bradley, were longtime associates of Sandusky. No one is accusing them of any wrongdoing, but there are questions about what they knew, or should have known, about their former colleague.
This is shaping up as the biggest scandal in college sports history. A bowl would be more of a distraction than a reward. Penn State would be better served sitting this bowl season out.
Time to check priorities
If interim President Rodney Erickson wants to take a positive step, he'll remove Penn State from the bowl pool. If he doesn't, Big Ten Commissioner Jim Delany should do it for him.
I'm not one of these extremists who advocate kicking Penn State out of the conference or taking Paterno's name off the library. But Notre Dame has turned down bowl bids during coaching transitions, and Miami self-imposed a bowl ban because of its Nevin Shapiro shame.
Penn State needs time to step back, get away from football and re-rank its priorities. Playing in a bowl is not one of them.
Don't punish players
Based on what is known, no Penn State player has done anything wrong pertaining to the Jerry Sandusky child sex abuse scandal. So why should the players be punished?