Author Amy Grace Loyd

Author Amy Grace Loyd poses on the Brooklyn Heights Promenade in Brooklyn, NY on Sept. 4, 2013. Loyd's novel, The Affairs of Others, was published last month by Picador. (Chicago Tribune / August 31, 2013)

Like many people in the publishing world, Amy Grace Loyd always wanted to be a writer. But unlike most of her colleagues, Loyd has managed to make her ultimate goal — publishing her own fiction, rather than someone else’s — a reality. After six years as fiction editor at Playboy and, more recently, as an executive editor at the e-publisher Byliner, Loyd is making an impressive debut as a novelist with “The Affairs of Others.”

This piece first ran in Printers Row Journal, delivered to Printers Row members with the Sunday Chicago Tribune and by digital edition via email. Click here to learn about joining Printers Row.

In the novel, Loyd gives us Celia Cassill, a middle-aged widow still struggling with grief after her husband’s death several years earlier. Her instinct is to withdraw from the world and keep herself separate from her neighbors, but this proves impossible when she becomes the owner of a small apartment building in Brooklyn. One tenant, an elderly man, goes missing, and Celia finds herself going in search of him. She also becomes embroiled in the exotic goings-on of another tenant, a woman named Hope, with whom she ultimately becomes intimate in surprising ways.

Printers Row Journal caught up with Loyd, 44, at her parents' home near Portsmouth, N.H., where she was visiting from Brooklyn. Here's an edited transcript of our chat.

Q: What's it been like to go from editing fiction to writing it? Did you have any apprehension about doing that which previously you were critiquing and editing?

A: When I started in publishing, I worked at Simon & Schuster and Pocket Books briefly, and then I went to Norton as an editorial assistant. And I think I got into publishing because I liked to write, and I liked to read. I think I always thought I'd write fiction, although I wasn't terribly open about it. Especially when I got older, it was more of a secret — not a terribly well-kept secret, but I wouldn't share it with my writers. I was raised by a very smart investment banker who would, when I would speak of being a writer, get a little worried.

But being close to writers and writing seemed a natural thing for me to do. And as I grew in my career and started editing the likes of Margaret Atwood and Joyce Carol Oates, I think it was more and more important for me to keep the two things separate, to keep my writing private. And it became more and more of a refuge from doing the things I was doing, whether at Playboy or the New York Review of Books or The New Yorker, where I also worked briefly. Those places are very compatible with my writing in that they were a great way for me to learn about what is a good story, the things you can do to help your reader live in the experience. I don't know if you've ever interviewed any of the writers I've worked with —

Q: Actually I have, including Atwood and Oates.

A: Well, if you asked them about working with me, they'd tell you I'm a bit of a pain in the neck. (Laughs.)

Q: How are you a pain in the neck?

A: Well, for example, if you're going to be inconsistent, I like you to be consistent in your inconsistency. If you introduce a question, I like you to answer it, or at least acknowledge that you've not answered it in some way. I'm very mindful on the writers' behalf of the readers' expectations, the expectations they're setting up in the piece. If you're writing a realistic piece, I'm a stickler about verisimilitude. It's like, "This is here, but why isn't it over there?" So the question is, "Have your intentions been fulfilled?" So I'm a pain in the neck as an editor, and I'm always saying to writers, "It's so important to get another set of eyes" — someone for whom the intention of the work is not implicit. I take writers out of their implicitness so that they can see the work as a reader — a reader new to the work — might see it.

Q: How does that work in terms of your own writing?

A: I'd say it's both a boon and a big disservice. I have to keep myself from editing myself, or I won't get any work done. It's a real act of self-management. I think I was helped, in "The Affairs of Others," by the fact (that) Celia has a really distinctive voice, and once I was in the rhythm of her voice, I could keep the editor in me at bay.

But it does slow my progress down a good deal. If I sit down to write, to invent, to move the plot, and I'm in too much of an editor mindset, it's very hard for me to get words on the page. I'll look at it too granularly. I like language, as you can probably tell; sometimes my sentences are pretty short, but other times they're kind of a meal. And I'm aware as a reader and editor that I want to control that; I want to make sure I'm picking my spots, so to speak. So there was me coming in and saying, "Why don't you put a period in here somewhere?" (Laughs.) I would have those kinds of conversations with myself. Which I think are very useful, but I don't think I'm ever going to be the fastest writer in the world. Alas.

Q: You've been quoted as saying you wrote the novel "partly out of rebellion." In your job at Playboy, you were very busy and constantly in contact with other people, and in some way Celia is the opposite of that.

A: You know, I really drank the Kool-Aid at Playboy. I really believed I could remind people of the magazine's great literary tradition in its heyday, and I stepped in with both feet. But I didn't always know what I was up against in terms of people's perceptions. There was a lot of phone calling, a lot of emailing, a lot of following people on Twitter, a lot of lunches and drinks.

What was so delicious about Celia is that she's at such a remove from all of that kind of busyness. The narrative she's creating is for her. The narrative I was creating was to make people see Playboy for its entire landscape, and not just the obvious parts of its landscape. (Laughs.) There's a lot of sex in this book, of course, and when I was working at Playboy, it was hard not to think about sex, and that impacted the book, too. I wanted to portray sex that's about healing, whereas Playboy is about sex as play, sex as adventure, sex as commerce. So the novel was for me a wonderful way of balancing myself, cleansing my palate.

Q: I get the feeling you felt you weren't successful in changing perceptions about Playboy.

A: Well, we did some terrific things. We got Stephen King into the magazine. Denis Johnson wrote a novel, "Nobody Move," in four parts on deadline for us. I also got some great women writers in there, including Jennifer duBois, Michelle Richmond, Margaret Atwood, Joyce Carol Oates, Nadine Gordimer, A.S. Byatt. So I think we were successful in getting the material into the magazine, but what we weren't as successful at was having folks notice it. And I think it's because people's perception of Playboy are pretty calcified at this point. I knew which cliches were coming at me before they did. "I read it for the articles." "Can you get me into the Mansion?" "You going to the Grotto?" "Oh, you're the fiction editor — you must write erotic fiction." And I was like, "No, not at all. Just published a story by John Updike." (Laughs.) I couldn't take it so seriously that I didn't have a sense of humor about it, but there were times when I'd go to a party and I'd get the full complement of jokes, and I'd be like, "I gotta get the hell out of this party!"

Q: So what was the genesis of "The Affairs of Others"?