The 2007 law let Gail Purkey, who worked at two state jobs in the 1980s, receive a state pension based mostly on her long career and six-figure salary with the Illinois Federation of Teachers, the Tribune has found.
"I followed what the law said," Purkey recalled in an interview, emphasizing that she had to pay heavily into the pension system to qualify.
Under the 2007 pension law, employees of a statewide labor organization who had previously worked in Illinois government were given a special six-month window to rejoin the taxpayer-supported pension plan for rank-and-file state workers.
Without the change, Purkey may not have collected a state pension. She did not work at the two state jobs long enough to be vested, and Purkey said she cashed out about $5,000 in contributions to the pension plan when she took a position with the union. The Illinois Federation of Teachers is a statewide organization whose membership includes the Chicago Teachers Union.
The chance to rejoin the state workers' fund years later had such lucrative long-term potential that Purkey paid more than $600,000 for the opportunity, including rolling in other retirement fund dollars and writing personal checks.
Two other lobbyists for the Illinois Federation of Teachers used a different provision in the same 2007 law to line up hefty teacher pensions by subbing in a classroom for one day each. Angry lawmakers scaled back those benefits after Tribune and WGN-TV disclosures last fall, and Gov. Pat Quinn signed the legislation into law in January.
Those changes won't affect Purkey, whose retirement benefits represent another example of how legislators for years have tinkered with the pension code in ways that helped individuals or scored political points, often undermining the financial health of the pension funds.
Quinn and state lawmakers now are in a partisan deadlock over how to save money in one of the nation's worst-funded state pension systems, where debt could hit $93 billion next year.
Purkey's state employment included a stint in the 1980s working for Madigan's legislative staff while the Chicago Democrat served as minority leader and first became speaker. She later worked at the Illinois Arts Council, a state agency chaired by Madigan's wife, Shirley.
She spent less than seven years in those jobs before leaving Illinois government in 1988 for a position with the union, according to state payroll and pension records. She would have needed eight years to be eligible for a pension.
But the 2007 law, sponsored in the House by Madigan and handled by one of his top lieutenants, changed that. Today, Purkey's credited service with the State Employees' Retirement System includes not only her time working for the state, but also more than two decades as a union lobbyist and spokeswoman — enough time to qualify for free health coverage as well.
Her retirement checks are based on an average of Purkey's four highest salaries during her last 10 years with the union, or about $195,000, according to the pension system.
Two years into her retirement, Purkey already has collected more than $200,000, records show. She is getting $101,909 this year, and her pension grows with an annual 3 percent compounded cost-of-living increase every January.
The reform Quinn signed in January blocked two of Purkey's colleagues — Steven Preckwinkle, the union's political director, and lobbyist David Piccioli, a former Madigan staffer — from counting toward a teacher pension any union service before they subbed in a classroom.
The 2007 legislation passed in the post-election veto session in the fall of 2006. Days earlier, Democratic Gov. Rod Blagojevich was re-elected, and Democratic legislative victories kept Madigan and then-Senate President Emil Jones in control of their chambers.
The Illinois Federation of Teachers had showered the Democratic trio with cash, dwarfing the money it sent to Republicans.
Blagojevich, who won the union's endorsement, got more than $515,000; Madigan, the state party chairman, and his rank-and-file candidates got about $567,000; Senate Democrats got roughly $388,000, according to an analysis by Kent Redfield, a campaign finance expert from the University of Illinois at Springfield.