Anti-war protesters and city agree on NATO march route
Protest leader Andy Thayer speaks last week before a hearing on protesters' efforts to change their plans for a march during the NATO summit in May. (Nancy Stone, Chicago Tribune / April 4, 2012)
The city today granted a parade permit to the Coalition Against NATO/G8 War and Poverty Agenda that will begin at the city's preferred location --outside the Loop -- but will venture into the busy State Street corridor before heading south to McCormick Place convention center where world leaders will hold their meetings.
Protest organizer Andy Thayer said his group was satisfied with the alternate route for that Sunday, May 20, and would accept the permit so they could begin to publicize the specifics of the event.
However, the city rejected Thayer’s demand that Chicago officials back them up if the U.S. Secret Service tried to curtail the route to keep protesters out of "sight and sound" range of McCormick Place for security reasons. In a letter granting the permit, a city official wrote “such perimeters are not something as to which the city could or would seek to influence the Secret Service.”
City officials could not be immediately reached for comment.
The protest group wanted to start at Daley Plaza, but city officials said a large demonstration in the narrower and more crowded streets of the Loop would pose an unacceptable public safety risk at a time when about 50 foreign delegations are likely to be moving through downtown in heavily guarded motorcades.
City lawyers argued last week that demonstrators have a right to march but not a right to cause gridlock in the city.
Protesters argued that the city has been inconsistent and disingenuous with its treatment of their permit application. The Department of Transportation had approved a permit for an identical march the day before, May 19, when that was going to be the first day of the G-8 summit. But after President Barack Obama moved G-8 to Camp David, Thayer filed a new application to move the march back one day.
City officials defended the route change by saying that NATO would draw more delegations -- and more traffic congestion -- than G-8.