"This year's budget is a jobs budget," he said. "It does more for job creation than any budget in recent history."
Senate Minority Leader Pipkin, delivering the Republican response to O'Malley's address, charged that the governor's proposals are "neither tough nor balanced nor an investment."
Seeking to turn President Obama's State of the Union address against O'Malley, Pipkin noted that the president proposed federal tax increases only on households making more than $250,000, where O'Malley's phase-out of income tax dedications would hit households earning $100,000 and above.
"Maryland taxpayers who fall into that 98 percent of American families, the ones President Obama said should not suffer a tax hike, are the very same people who will suffer the pain of Governor O'Malley's increases in the state income tax and other taxes," Pipkin said.
But House Speaker Michael E. Busch said he thought O'Malley's speech was well received in a year where "everybody realizes there are a lot of challenges."
"He outlined what he thought the issues were for the state of Maryland to continue on a path of being a national leader," the Annapolis Democrat said.
Howard County Executive Ken Ulman, a Democrat, said it was difficult for him to focus on anything in the speech other than O'Malley's proposal to shift pension costs to the counties, an initiative that could cost Howard millions of dollars a year. Ulman, considered a possible gubernatorial contender in 2014, when O'Malley is barred from seeking a third term, said the change would "completely change the historic relationship" between the state and counties and would be "devastating" to his budget.
Harford County Executive David Craig, a potential Republican candidate for governor, said there "was absolutely nothing new" in O'Malley's speech. He, too, was upset with O'Malley's decision to move pension costs to the counties. "It is like inviting your children over for dinner and saying, 'You have to pay for it,'" Craig said.
Liberal Democrats have applauded much of the governor's agenda. Del. Maggie McIntosh of Baltimore, who chairs the House Environmental Matters Committee, welcomed the governor's proposals on Chesapeake Bay protections and jobs. But as a gay woman she found his speech especially moving.
"I'm particularly very pleased that he included in his State of the State an appeal for all Marylanders to recognize same-sex loving couples and supporting marriage equality," she said. She called it O'Malley's "best ever."
Moderate Democrats such as Del. Norman Conway, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, found some things to like in the address as well as some things less appealing.
"I think he was upbeat. Of course he always is," said Conway, who represents Wicomico and Worcester counties. He said he liked the governor's emphasis on job creation but he was less enthusiastic about O'Malley's call for a same-sex marriage bill.
"Just the term 'marriage' has its connotation for me," he said.
Highlights of O'Malley's agenda
•Budget and taxes: What O'Malley calls a "balanced approach," with $610 million in cuts and $311 million in new revenue, mostly from phasing out income tax exemptions and deductions for the top-earning 20 percent of taxpayers.
•Gas tax: Applying the state's 6 percent sales tax to gasoline purchases, phased in over three years, to raise $613 million for transportation projects.
•Pensions: Shifting much of the cost of teacher pensions from the state to the counties, saving the state $240 million, to help balance the budget and to give local governments a stake in controlling pension costs.
•Chesapeake Bay: Doubling revenue from the $2.50 a month "flush tax" to pay for upgrades of wastewater treatment plants. A second measure would place new restrictions on the development of housing that relies on polluting septic systems.
•Offshore wind: A new regulatory scheme intended to foster the development of an offshore wind power industry to diversify the state's energy sources and reduce pollution, albeit at a cost to ratepayers.
•Same-sex marriage: Allowing gay couples to enter into civil marriage on the same terms as opposite-sex couples, a move O'Malley contends would honor "human dignity" and protect families while respecting religious freedom.