Baltimore's Ravens, reigning champions of professional football, kick off their new season Thursday night on national television while its Orioles once again have reached September with a shot at the playoffs. What's not to like?
Plenty, say some Baltimore sports fans.
For one thing — actually, the main thing — the Ravens will play the Broncos in Denver, a mile high and 1,700 miles from home. This marks the first time since the custom began that the Super Bowl champion won't host the National Football League Kickoff, the opening game of the season. Denver gets the game and Baltimore gets a pregame consolation concert on a barge in the Inner Harbor, which upsets some fans.
- Bio | E-mail | Recent columns
- Ravens season opener: 25 ways to celebrate like it's at home [Pictures]
- NFL concert poses a challenge for police and traffic workers
- Broncos stadium really will be shaking for Ravens tonight, producer says
- NFL prepares for start of season [Pictures]
- 2013 NFL season predictions from The Baltimore Sun
- Meet the 2013 Ravens
- VIDEO: Zurawik on the NFL season opener on NBC
- Baltimore Orioles
- Baltimore Ravens
See more topics »
"I'd much rather we had a home game here. The Ravens won the Super Bowl, for crying out loud!" said Aaron Reinhart, owner of Swallow at the Hollow, a corner bar and restaurant at Northern Parkway and York Road in North Baltimore.
Of course, it's not the end of the world. But then, no one expects grown men and women to schedule the end of the world.
Scheduling a Ravens game around a weeknight Orioles game, how hard could that be?
Turns out, pretty hard. The teams negotiated last spring to try to accommodate a baseball-football doubleheader but couldn't come up with a solution. So the Ravens are in Colorado for an 8:30 p.m. kickoff on NBC.
Judging from social media comments and interviews with Baltimore sports fans, emotions about this run from anger to mild disappointment to shrugging resignation. Some Baltimoreans think it's a slap in the face. The NFL and the Orioles, they say, should have moved heaven and earth to make a home opener possible for the Ravens. Stephen A. Smith, the ESPN commentator, knocked the Orioles last week for not accommodating the Ravens, then sparred about it on Twitter with a Finksburg woman who defended the baseball team.
At the cozy Swallow, one of Reinhart's regular customers, Karl Beetz, also thinks the rap on the Orioles is unfair.
"What irritates me is people who want to make the Orioles the bad guy in this," Beetz said over a happy hour beer after a day of painting window frames at his house in Northwood. "They're not the bad guy."
But Reinhart thinks the Orioles could have tried harder.
"You're telling me they couldn't push the Orioles to a weekend doubleheader to give the Ravens a Thursday-night home game?" he said from behind the Swallow's well-stocked bar, beneath two TV screens almost always tuned to sports channels.
Someone along the bar answered: "A doubleheader would put the Orioles out of sync."
"I think their pitching staff is out of sync," Reinhart said.
Beetz, draft at hand, cut to the bottom line: "This is about business and money. The NFL wants to establish Thursday night as the big opening of the new season, no matter what. The NFL wants to have that whole day. They want to own the day."
Here's how Sept. 5 came to be a conundrum:
The Orioles have been scheduled to play a 7:05 p.m. home game against the Chicago White Sox on the first Thursday after Labor Day since the 2013 Major League Baseball schedule was released a year ago.
A problem arose with the Ravens' success. By winning Super Bowl XLVII in early February, they earned, among other honors, the right to host the NFL Kickoff — on the first Thursday after Labor Day.
Recognizing that conflict, representatives of the teams tried to work out a way to give the Ravens a home game. The NFL commissioner, Roger Goodell, called a potential baseball-football doubleheader the "right thing," and expressed hope that it would gain MLB approval.
But, like a lot of negotiations, this one was complicated.