Maryland Attorney General Douglas F. Gansler came under fire Tuesday for comments that his top rival in the Democratic primary for governor is running on little besides his African-American heritage.
Gansler told a group of potential volunteers that Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown's campaign strategy amounted to "Vote for me, I want to be the first African-American governor of Maryland," according to a transcript of the secretly taped meeting published by The Washington Post on Tuesday.
The attorney general went on to criticize Brown's record, calling it "a little thin" and accusing him of "trying to get coronated" by the party establishment.
The remarks sparked an escalating exchange between the two prominent Democrats. Brown's campaign called for an apology. Gansler refused to give one, instead lobbing back criticism that Brown has been dodging a scandal in Maryland's prison system.
"I'm disappointed that Doug Gansler has decided to ignore my record and instead focus on race in this election," Brown said in a statement, though he declined to be interviewed.
"Doug Gansler is out of control before this campaign even started," added Brown's campaign manager, Justin Schall. "He got caught red-handed attacking other Democrats. Gansler's the only the one talking about race."
Gansler strategist Doug Thornell shot back, "Spare us the phony outrage. The Brown campaign has spent more time stirring up controversy and division today than they have spent the entire campaign addressing important issues like the prison crisis, on which he has been all but silent."
On his way in to a meeting with pro-transit activists Tuesday night, Gansler refused to back down and insisted he was not making race an issue in the governor's race.
"This should not be about race. This should be about our record, where we want to take the state of Maryland to build the best Maryland, whose got the best character, whose got the best leadership qualities."
While Brown supporters and others were quick to chastise Gansler and predicted his remarks about race would alienate voters, some observers discounted whether they would significantly affect the 2014 race for governor.
Gansler's campaign did not dispute the authenticity of the recording of the meeting, which took place in Annapolis in July, but accused the Brown campaign of "dirty tricks." The Brown camp denied any involvement in the recording or its distribution.
Thornell said Gansler "understands that taken out of context, as it was, his words could be misinterpreted by some, and for that he is deeply disappointed. "
The comments in the secret recording are the first major flap in the campaign to succeed term-limited Gov. Martin O'Malley.
Gansler "has just offended a whole lot of voters he cannot afford to offend," said Donald F. Norris, chairman of the public policy department at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County. Were another candidate to imply that the only reason Gansler was a contender for governor is that he's Jewish, "that would inflame Jewish voters, as it should," Norris said.
Brown, the son of a Jamaican doctor and a Swiss mother, has not overtly campaigned on his heritage since launching his campaign in May, though some supporters have stressed that his election would be a milestone for Maryland African-Americans. African-American voters make up roughly a quarter of the state electorate and a larger percentage of Democratic primary voters.
On the recording, Gansler said he plans to formally launch his campaign in September and name an African-American lieutenant governor to the ticket a few weeks later. "It will be an African-American, and it will be somebody from either Baltimore or Prince George's," he said. "I cannot overstate the amount of pressure I have from both of those places to get a person from there."
Asked by reporters why he would specify the race of his running mate if race was not an issue, Gansler insisted there was no contradiction.
Gansler complained that the recording was made at a private meeting of his supporters.
"Obviously, that was a felony. That was a misuse of the wiretap statute," he said, referring to a law requiring the consent of both parties to record some conversations. He added, however, that his office would not prosecute the alleged offense.
There is some question about whether the person who made that tape could be prosecuted. In 2009, Assistant Attorney General Kathryn Rowe wrote an advisory opinion saying surreptitious taping of a political meeting would not be an offense if the meeting were open to the public because there would be no expectation of privacy.