Blackmun on USOC progress: Not quite to base camp

Part two of Q-and-A with the USOC's chief executive

Four-time Olympic hockey medalist Angela Ruggiero formally being named an IOC member at the closing ceremony in Vancouver.  Ruggiero has made quick strides in IOC circles.  (Cameron Spencer / Getty Images)

Four-time Olympic hockey medalist Angela Ruggiero formally being named an IOC member at the closing ceremony in Vancouver. Ruggiero has made quick strides in IOC circles. (Cameron Spencer / Getty Images / February 28, 2010)

Scott Blackmun became the U.S. Olympic Committee’s chief executive after that organization’s most recent leadership circus.

The good thing is “recent” now means 3 ½ years ago.

The bad thing is the USOC’s history since it was made the overall governing agency of Olympic business in the United States in 1978 had been one clown act after another.

In the period from 1999-2003, the USOC had four presidents and three CEOs.   Prior to that, the average CEO term worked out to just 2.2 years.

The turnover, with its accompanying airing of dirty laundry, destroyed the organization’s credibility, led it to be dragged before Congress and killed any chances of establishing relationships with international sports leaders.  From one day to the next, no one knew who was running the USOC’s ship of fools.

Blackmun is a former USOC general counsel who was briefly interim CEO during one of the paroxysms of chaos.  Since he took over as full-time boss in January, 2010, following the USOC board’s heavy-handed ouster of CEO Jim Scheer and the failure of acting CEO Stephanie Streeter’s bold-faced power grab at the job , the USOC has made headlines only for the achievements of its athletes.

Working in harmony with volunteer board chairman Larry Probst, now fully invested in the time-consuming international relations responsibilities of a position he once thought would require just a few hours per month, Blackmun has managed to move the USOC slowly and quietly forward.  Its big internal news these days comes from making tweaks – like Wednesday’s naming of Olympic champion Benita Fitzgerald Mosley as chief of organizational excellence (whatever that is) - that attract little attention.

In part two of this Q-and-A with Blackmun (for part one, click here), the focus is on the USOC as an organization.

Q.  How much easier has the prolonged stability at the top made doing everything in your job?

A.  Internationally, it has made all the difference in the world.  First, people in the U.S. were ready for some stability.  We have earned some credibility with our own NGBs (national governing bodies of Olympic sports) and the AAC (athletes advisory councul) because of the transparency and accountability that exists today.

Because we are respected at home, it is much easier for us to be respected when we travel internationally.  Combine that with the fact Larry and I are both spending a lot of time on the road - I don’t think it’s a complicated business (establishing international ties), but I think it is a very time-intensive business.  We are just now building relationships that hopefully will be a part of the landscape for a long time.

Q.  Would Larry continue as chairman beyond 2016?  (The terms are four years.)

A.  I hope he does.  He has built some very good friendships internationally.  I think he has the respect of the board.  I would love to see him stay as long as possible.

Q.  What about you?  Any feelings about how much longer you would like to go.  (Blackmun will be 56 in September.)

A.  I don’t have any feelings on what my time horizon is going to be.  I have no intention of leaving.

Q.  The U.S. still has just three IOC members (one, Angela Ruggiero, has a fixed term as an athlete-elected member)   What are the chances of the U.S. having another?

A.  We would like to have one, but so would a lot of other countries.

Q.   Is your best chance to get one by having a U.S. person become head of an international federation that automatically has an IOC member?  (Note: that accounts for Switzerland having five IOC members.)

A.  As I look at our runway the next 10 years, one thing we need to do a much better job of is to get Americans more involved in international federation leadership.  It is a weakness for us right now.  That is not because it will help us get an IOC membership; it is because it is important for our success.

(My note:  Probst may have a shot at being named one of the 15 members from the National Olympic Committee senior executive category, which has at least one opening.)

Featured Stories

CTnow is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on ctnow.com articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.