Is it really necessary every time the subject of the voting commission investigation is mentioned to say in the same breath that allegations of illegal voting in last year’s election are “without evidence” [News Briefing, Dec. 27, “Federal Court Rejects Challenge To Trump Voting Commission”]?
Actually, there is plenty of evidence. Maybe some intrepid reporters could attempt to investigate this issue themselves, instead of endlessly speculating on an issue where there actually is no evidence — to wit, the phony Mueller investigation, which began without evidence of supposed Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. Tiresome.
Paul Ferla, Avon