By DANIELA ALTIMARI, firstname.lastname@example.org
The Hartford Courant
9:40 PM EDT, April 23, 2013
The historic votes on gun control during the last few weeks — in the General Assembly and in the U.S. Senate — have exposed deep fissures among Connecticut Republicans strugging to define their moderate brand of politics.
Some Republicans view the party leaders who helped craft the state's sweeping new gun control law as traitors guilty of selling out the Constitution.
"These Republicans stood on the throat of our forefathers and crushed the breath out of them,'' Mary Ann Turner, the outspoken Republican chairwoman in Enfield, wrote in a recent email to other town committee members in north central Connecticut. "The political cannons have been fired."
But other members of the party heaped praise on John McKinney, the GOP leader in the state Senate, and Larry Cafero, his counterpart in the House of Representatives. Both men played key roles in winning passage of the bipartisan gun bill, which includes an expanded assault weapons ban and more rigorous background checks. The measure was signed into law by Democratic Gov. Dannel P. Malloy earlier this month.
"Given what happened here in Connecticut, I think our Republican leaders did a wonderful job on the bill,'' said Desiree Soli, the Republican town chairwoman in Westport. "I commend them for the work they did."
Connecticut Republicans are trying to expand their reach by backing away from the hardline conservatives that dominate the party's leadership ranks in Congress. "We don't do God, guns or gays,'' Cafero proclaimed several years ago. "That's not what Connecticut Republicans should be focused on. We're focused on fiscal accountability.''
Unlike the Second Amendment absolutists who wield enormous clout in rural red states, Connecticut's urban and suburban voter base is more accepting of gun restrictions. A Quinnipiac University poll released in early March, about three months after 20 first-graders and six women were shot and killed at Sandy Hook Elementary School, found broad support in Connecticut, even among Republicans, for most gun control measures, including universal background checks and a statewide ban on all assault weapons.
Yet the deep roots of the state's firearms industry, along a strong libertarian streak, have led some Republicans to reject gun control and those in their own party who support it. Turner said she is boycotting the party's annual Prescott Bush fundraiser next month to protest the party's decision to honor McKinney with its top award.
Roiling anger over the gun vote is likely to have repercussions in the 2014 Republican race for governor. McKinney and Cafero are both pondering a run, as is another Republican who has expressed support for the new gun law, Danbury Mayor Mark Boughton.
Tom Foley, the party's 2010 nominee who is launching another bid, has been the target of a relentless public relations assault by state Democrats, who accuse him of dodging the issue.
Foley, who finds the attention from Democrats "flattering," said the gun control law would have looked very different had he been governor. He declined to endorse the new Connecticut gun legislation and faulted the sweeping package for failing to address both mental illness and urban gun violence.
"State mental health institutions were shut down 30-something years ago ... and have not been replaced with institutional care for the severely mentally ill,'' Foley said. "Sandy Hook is a terrible tragedy and we want to make sure it doesn't happen again, but these types of crimes are very infrequent. ... In our cities, we have people being killed every month and I don't think this bill is going to address that gun violence much, if at all.''
Foley said expanded criminal background checks for gun purchases is, "to most law-abiding gun owners", the least objectionable gun control provision, even though such a requirement could not pass the U.S. Senate. "But,'' Foley added, while he supports more background checks, they "would not have prevented Sandy Hook.''
Boughton, meanwhile, said he backs "common sense" gun reform, including the background check provision that the U.S. Senate rejected. "That bill was so watered down and so easy to support, I just don't get it," he said.
While four Democratic U.S. senators from rural Western states also voted against background checks, the vote will likely cause more problems for Republicans in states such as Connecticut, Boughton said. "I absolutely think it does hurt the party,'' he said. "Our brand is hurt when we don't explain to the people on Main Street what the problems are with a piece of legislation."
The gun divide has created one more challenge for Republican State Chairman Jerry Labriola Jr. Republicans in Connecticut are outnumbered by unaffiliated voters and Democrats; they do not hold any of the state's congressional seats or the governor's office and are in the minority in both chambers of the General Assembly.
As Labriola launches an ambitious effort to reach out to unaffiliated voters and emphasize the state party's independence from the national GOP, he has to overcome the suspicions of Republicans like Turner, who feel betrayed.
"We're an open party and a big tent,'' Labriola said. "We need to be respectful of opposing views on difficult issues if we ever want to become the majority party. I want to be a chairman of inclusion, not a chairman of exclusion, expulsion or subtraction."
"To start winning elections,'' Labriola added, "the Republican Party needs to put away the angry frown and put a smile on its face."
But the smiley face and the big tent aren't resonating with many gun owners, who are expressing their outrage on Facebook, Twitter and gun-rights blogs. "I would like to nominate McKinney for the Benedict Arnold award,'' wrote one commenter on the Connecticut Citizens Defense League blog.
"I hope the CT GOP hears the message loud and clear,'' wrote Daria Novak, a businesswoman from Madison who unsuccessfully sought the Republican nomination for the 2nd Congressional District in 2010 and 2012. "We support the Constitution and those who defend, not defile our rights!"
McKinney, whose district includes Newtown and who spent hours with grieving Sandy Hook families, said he understands the strong passions by people on both sides.
"I've heard from a lot of people on both sides,'' he said. "I've received a lot of phone calls and emails thanking me for my vote [and] for the way we handled the process in a bipartisan manner, not in a partisan shouting match. … I've also heard from people who disagree with my vote and their disagreements range from disappointment to anger.''
Labriola noted that the split over guns is not as much a partisan divide as a geographic one. "Our caucuses were split on the gun vote. ... Our rural members voted 'no' and our suburban members voted 'yes,''' he said. "Essentially members voted their district and that's how representative democracy works. It's not the role of the state chairman to take sides in such cases. It's my role to unite our party.''
Cafero, R-Norwalk, said there was never any doubt that the legislature would respond to the massacre at Sandy Hook. Right after the shootings, some Democrats were calling for new limits on the number of guns people could own, steep taxes on ammunition and a host of other proposals that many gun owners would have rejected. Republicans said their presence at the negotiating table helped stave off even stricter gun control measures.
"I felt I had an obligation to make sure there was a balance between the safety of the public ... and also the protection of the Second Amendment and law abiding gun owners," Cafero said. "Can you imagine had I, as one of the leading Republicans in the state, had said 'thanks but no thanks' and declined to participate? [I] would have appropriately been lambasted.
"We had to participate in that debate. To do otherwise would have been the death knell of the party,'' Cafero added. "I had to protect my brand. … It's not like in Washington, where one party has control of one house and one party controls the other.''
Scott Guilmartin, the co-chairman of the Republican town committee in rural Suffield, was among those who received Turner's letter. While he respects her right to express herself, he does not share her frustration.
"It's hard to find a candidate that you agree with on every single issue,'' Guilmartin said. "As a gun owner myself, I support stronger background checks, even though I don't they would have prevented Newtown."
But ultimately, Guilmartin and other Republicans say, they believe the deep divisions over gun policy within the Republican Party will melt away once the 2014 political season begins in earnest.
"I think economic issues will be the main focus by the time the election rolls around,'' he said. "I sure hope they will."
Copyright © 2014, The Hartford Courant