Cellphones to keep track of your purchases -- and you

At the moment, the most common form of RFID tagging in this country is what's known as a "passive" emitter. That means the tag has no independent power source and must be activated by an external scanner, usually within a range of up to 25 feet.

Increasingly, passive tags are being replaced with tiny, battery-operated "active" tags that continuously transmit signals as far as 300 feet. Those signals could be picked up by anyone with an RFID scanner.

Numerous companies have filed patent applications in recent years for use of RFID technology to monitor people's activities.

In 2006, for example, IBM received patent approval for a system that could be "used to monitor the movement of the person through the store or other areas."

That "or other areas" is what spooks privacy advocates. At the moment, there are few limits on how this technology can be used.

"The notion that we're building a surveillance society is very real," said Sophia Cope, a staff attorney at the Center for Democracy and Technology, which focuses on civil liberties in the digital age.

Although she acknowledged the myriad benefits of RFID technology, Cope said it was all too easy to imagine cellphone tags being used to monitor people's activities from morning to night.

In a messy divorce case, for instance, records could be subpoenaed from wireless companies that would show not just where and when you made a purchase, but also precisely where you went afterward and how long you stayed there.

Cellphone services already have the ability to pinpoint users on their network. What makes RFID more troublesome is the ease with which the technology can be exploited by others -- that is, companies and government agencies that don't operate wireless networks.

Similarly, tags could be constantly beaming people's name, address and bank account number to anyone capable of picking up the signal, potentially ushering in a new era of identity theft.

"I'd like to say this technology can be controlled," Cope said. "But there's a lot of room for abuse if this isn't implemented correctly."

Desautels at CTIA said the wireless industry is aware of the security concerns surrounding RFID.

"Is there a danger here?" he asked. "No one in the industry has minimized the need to protect consumer information."

It's still early enough in the game for regulators to protect consumers. Some suggestions:

* All RFID-equipped cellphones should have the capability to switch off the technology or at the very least to block the signal. It shouldn't be an all-or-nothing proposition.

* Cellphone makers should be required to produce non-RFID handsets for people with no desire for electronic payments.

* Consumers should be clearly informed about what types of information will be stored on their RFID tags, and should be given the ability to make changes as they see fit.

* Sales of RFID scanners should be limited only to those with a legitimate need to possess the technology.

* Laws should be passed clearly defining the circumstances under which companies and government agencies can track RFID tags and requiring court orders for the technology to be used for surveillance purposes.

There were more than 243 million wireless subscribers nationwide as of June 2007. Considering the stakes, does anyone really think this is a technology that should be left to the honor system?

Consumer Confidential runs Wednesdays and Sundays. Send your tips or feedback to david.lazarus@latimes.com.



Featured Stories

CTnow is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on ctnow.com articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

CONSUMER COLUMNISTS

Gail MarksJarvis

Did 'Santa Claus' come to town early for the markets? - November 25, 2014 - Did Santa sneak down your chimney earlier in November and drop so much candy into your investment stocking that he won't show up again...

David Lazarus

Understanding the pitfalls of reverse mortgages - November 27, 2014 - Retirement is an increasingly scary prospect. Some experts say a couple will require at least $2 million to live comfortably. Some say you...

Korky Vann

Black Friday Sales At Local Shops - November 25, 2014 - Looking for alternatives to the mall? Try these indie sales.

Advertisement

...