Ownership of personal data still appears up for grabs

The simple concept that people own their personal information seems lost in a U.S. report that calls for greater protection of people's personal information.

Senior White House counselor John Podesta

The White House reiterated its call last week for greater protection of people's personal info -- two years after proposing a "privacy bill of rights" that went nowhere in Congress. Above, spokesman John Podesta. (Brendan Smialowski / AFP/Getty Images / May 5, 2014)

Your personal information is yours.

I'll repeat that: Your personal information is yours.

Yet that simple idea, which should serve as the basis of all privacy-related laws and regulations in the United States, seems to have eluded those who profess to be the guardians of consumer data.

The White House reiterated its call last week for greater protection of people's personal info — two years after proposing a "privacy bill of rights" that went nowhere in Congress.

A new report, written by a group led by White House counselor John Podesta, says that "big data" — the various entities that benefit from knowing all there is to know about you — is growing out of control.

"We're talking about sensors in our homes, cities, wearable devices, that constantly collect and share information about our surroundings, our behavior, our health and our whereabouts," Podesta told reporters.

His report suggests some modest legislative changes, along with "voluntary, enforceable codes of conduct" for businesses and government agencies to keep consumer data from being abused or getting into the wrong hands.

I don't know. Seems to me that if sensors everywhere is the problem, voluntary codes of conduct aren't the solution.

Moreover, while the report addresses the ease with which people's information can be collected, crunched and put to use, it fails to adequately convey the sense of violation that comes with businesses and government officials knowing your habits, behavior and activities.

Privacy advocates welcomed the administration's attention to these issues but said the report didn't go far enough in keeping people's personal data under wraps.

"It's nice that there's recognition of the problem," said Lee Tien, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco digital rights group. "But the report makes it sound like 'big data' is just a thing that's out there.

"It's like 'Soylent Green,'" he said. "Big data is people. It's our information."

Kevin Bankston, policy director for the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, a tech-related think tank, wondered whether the report was "ultimately a distraction that has needlessly taken focus away from the debate over how to rein in the National Security Agency's massive surveillance programs."

There's probably something to such criticism. President Obama had ordered the privacy report in response to outrage here and abroad over revelations that the NSA was snooping on friends and foes.

The final product, however, didn't delve deeply into the agency's activities, seeking instead to focus on broader privacy issues.

And that might have been fine if the report had sought to identify and regulate some of the biggest exploiters of people's information, often without anyone's say-so. But it didn't.

"The report failed to identify the commercial surveillance complex that has been put in place by Google, Facebook and many other data-driven businesses," said Jeff Chester, executive director of the Center for Digital Democracy, a privacy advocacy group.

"We are concerned that the report may give a green light to expanded data collection, where the principle is collect first and worry about privacy and consumer protection later," he said.

I wrote recently about Verizon Wireless quietly downloading code into people's home computers that would transmit your online browsing to marketers, who could then target you with related ads on your smartphone or tablet.

Such corporate spying is apparently legal and, experts say, will become increasingly common as businesses try to track consumers from device to device.

Featured Stories

CTnow is using Facebook comments on stories. To comment on ctnow.com articles, sign into Facebook and enter your comment in the field below. Comments will appear in your Facebook News Feed unless you choose otherwise. To report spam or abuse, click the X next to the comment. For guidelines on commenting, click here.

CONSUMER COLUMNISTS

Kevin Hunt - The Electronic Jungle

Kevin Hunt: Review: The T-fal OptiGrill (Watch Out, George Foreman) - October 14, 2014 - If a George Foreman indoor grill had a brain, it might use an optical sensor to detect the thickness of steak and automatically cook to...

Gail MarksJarvis

Eurozone troubles weigh on investors - October 21, 2014 - If a new bout of recession and deflation takes hold in the eurozone, investors worry the U.S. could be infected too.

David Lazarus

What's behind the huge price jump for some generic drugs? - October 20, 2014 - Why are the prices of some generic drugs so darn high?

Korky Vann

Weekend Discounts Include Kids' Consignment Sale In Simsbury - October 16, 2014 - >>Latimer Lane PTO's consignment sale Saturday in Simsbury features like-new children's fall and winter clothing,...

Advertisement

...