"Dr. Midei's violations were repeated and serious," board members wrote in an 11-page order. "They unnecessarily exposed his patients to the risk of harm. They increased the cost of the patients' medical care."
- Doctor's use of unnecessary stents raises question of informed consent
- Order by the State Board of Physicians
- Criminal trial begins for Eastern Shore doctor
- Medical Services
- Trials and Arbitration
- Medical Procedures and Tests
See more topics »
St Joseph Medical Center, 7601 Osler Dr, Towson, MD 21204, USA
The revocation "validates what we've been saying all along, which is that Dr. Midei was engaged in egregious malpractice and fraud," said Andrew G. Slutkin, a Baltimore attorney who has filed nearly 20 patient lawsuits against Midei.
One of Midei's attorneys, Stephen Snyder, said the "political pressure" to revoke Midei's license was too great for the board to ignore.
The board ruled that Midei violated five provisions of the state's Medical Practice Act while working at St. Joseph through unprofessional conduct, false reports, gross overutilization of health care services, standards of care violations and the failure to keep adequate medical records.
Specifically, the board found that he inserted cardiac stents into arteries that weren't clogged enough to need them — likely because of "pressure to produce."
"Dr. Midei testified that he understood that he was a big generator of business for the hospital, that the hospital had lost many patients to competition and that its goal was to hold onto the stent business that it saw slipping away," board members wrote, noting that Midei was hired to run St. Joseph's cardiac catheterization lab at a seven-figure salary that was triple his prior earnings.
Snyder said the board's decision was not "supported by the evidence."
"I always believed in Dr. Midei, and I put my heart and soul into [his defense]," Snyder said. "Unfortunately, I think a fine doctor is being put out to pasture and that the community receives a disservice by him not being able to continue to save lives."
Snyder said he will discuss an appeal with Midei. He also provided a statement from Dr. William O'Neill, executive dean of clinical affairs at the University of Miami's Miller School of Medicine. O'Neill was paid more than $28,000 by Midei's defense team to review the patient case files and testify on Midei's behalf.
He says he found no unwarranted stents.
"I pity any interventional cardiologist practicing in Maryland today," O'Neill said. "If Dr. Midei can lose his license, any of them could."
Midei could not be reached for comment.
Midei filed a lawsuit against St. Joseph, claiming he was made a scapegoat by hospital administrators who were trying to deflect attention from a separate kickback scandal. St. Joseph paid the federal government $22 million to settle the kickback claims, as well as to repay Medicare funds received for Midei's suspicious stents.
In a statement Wednesday, the hospital said it respects the board's decision regarding Midei.
He is one of at least three Maryland doctors recently accused of unnecessary medical procedures.
John R. McLean, a cardiologist who practiced on the Eastern Shore, is currently on trial on charges of fraud and false statements in Baltimore's U.S. District Court, accused of implanting unnecessary stents. And the federal government sued a Baltimore eye doctor in March, claiming that he repeatedly performed unnecessary laser eye surgery.
"I think everybody realizes we need to step up here and assure the public" that medical safety is a priority for the state, said Del. Dan K. Morhaim, a physician who introduced legislation this year to strengthen doctor oversight. It passed unanimously.