Even for suppliers who don't directly sell to the Boeing or Airbus duopoly, what the government called "exceptional pressure" rolls downhill.
"We're spending colossal amounts of time in wringing costs out of the product," said Andrew Gibson, CEO of AeroCision, an aerospace engine parts manufacturer. In the past two years, the pressure from engine makers to lower costs has intensified, he said.
Engine manufacturers sign 3 to 10-year contracts with suppliers such as AeroCision, and require that those supplies sell the part for 3 percent to 5 percent less each year.
Since AeroCision does not control how the part is designed — so it cannot control materials costs — the only ways to control costs are by reducing the amount of time it takes to produce each part, or the amount of labor that goes into it, or moving labor to lower-cost countries.
AeroCision does all three.
Engine makers usually give most of the orders for any given part to one factory, Gibson said. A second factory chosen to make the part reduces risk for the engine-maker — and provides another way to pressure the supply chain on costs.
"You hope to acquire between 70 to 80 percent of a part [run]," Gibson said. "If your cost is not competitive, they'll toggle it over. We're not in the business to be a backup."
The plant, bought by Houston investor Patrick Bromley in 2005, has 64 workers, 30 percent fewer than under the previous ownership, even as sales have grown.
AeroCision has moved up the value chain in the complexity of the precision rings it makes, so the value of those parts has risen.
When Gibson took over in 2008, the average price of a part AeroCision made was less than $400. Now it's between $6,000 and $8,000.
Sales in 2014 are projected to be the same level as 2013, Gibson said. In 2013, he said, Aerocision had between $15 million and $20 million in revenue.
"We are doing more than double the productivity," Gibson said. Half of those savings went to Rolls-Royce and other customers. The rest was used to buy machines that allow more of the work to be automated, to wage increases, and to health care increases.
"None of it's going back in our pocket. We put it all back in," Bromley said.
One of the major capital costs was opening a plant in Bangalore, India. Its production began in July. Aerocision is a 50/50 partner with a local family that had been doing automobile manufacturing for decades.
"Presently, we're finishing the parts here in America, but that will change," Gibson said.
There are 15 employees in India, but with a building as large as the one in Chester, "we can grow and grow and grow there." By the end of 2016, Aerocision expects to have 50 workers in India.
Aerospace manufacturing has been moving to Poland, Mexico and China, but Aerocision found India attractive both because it is in Asia, near one of Rolls-Royce's assembly centers in Singapore, and because there is no language barrier.
Opening in India will not mean less employment in Connecticut. AeroCision expects to need five new employees in the state in 2015 and 15 more in 2016. The company is planning for a second shift.
AeroCision is unusual among aerospace firms in turning to India — though some other small aerospace companies added capacity in Poland and Mexico years ago.