Sign up today and save up to 83% on a Hartford Courant digital subscription
CT Now

Ehrlich misleading on voting rights

Former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich, Jr. is entitled to his belief that the Supreme Court did the right thing in striking at the heart of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 ("Court's Voting Rights Act ruling should be a cause for celebration," July 14). He is not entitled to misleadingly quote from Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's dissent.

"Even Judge Ruth Bader Ginsberg's dissenting opinion cites the 'impressive' voting rights progress that has taken place in the impacted states [subject to pre-clearance of voting changes by the U.S. Justice Department]," writes the former governor.

This is what Justice Ginsburg wrote: "True, conditions in the South have impressively improved since passage of the Voting Rights Act. Congress noted this improvement and found that the VRA was the driving force behind it."

The former governor owes an apology to the justice and his readers.

Del. Samuel I. "Sandy" Rosenberg, Baltimore

The writer, a Democrat, represents Baltimore District 41 in the Maryland House of Delegates.

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Voter ID laws are essential to prevent fraud at the polls

    Voter ID laws are essential to prevent fraud at the polls

    Requiring a photo ID is frequently, and inaccurately, said to be a method of suppressing minority votes. Walmart requires a photo ID to exchange a purchase. Not to get a refund, but simply to trade a purchase for something of the same price for a different size or color.

  • Holder should not pick on Texas for voter ID law

    Holder should not pick on Texas for voter ID law

    So Attorney General Eric Holder can't stand the fact that Texas is going to require voter ID ("Congress must fix Voting Rights Act," July 29). I really don't see anything wrong with that. You need ID to buy cough medicine at the drug store, to get into an R rated movie, to get a driver's license,...

  • New obstacles for voters

    New obstacles for voters

    Our view: Election officials in states covered by the 1965 Voting Rights Act are interpreting the Supreme Court decision striking down a key provision of the law as a license to discriminate against minorities

  • Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

    Ehrlich's delusions of grandeur

    The Sun's front page recently carried the article, "Ehrlich entertains presidential hopes" (Dec. 3), yet it was not April 1. Surely, this was a joke. It's even more preposterous than Martin O'Malley running for president!

  • Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Unforced errors or tactical mistakes?

    Political pundits like to label gratuitous political gaffes as "unforced errors" — mistakes that come out of right field without warning or reason.

  • Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Why Obama is viewed as weak

    Two recent Presidential pronouncements reflect the essential Barack Obama. Each also explains why so many view him to be the weakest of American presidents.

  • Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Ehrlich's 'cult of anti-Obamaism'

    Though I am 1960s retread boomer and unrepentant liberal who usually disagrees commentator Robert L. Ehrlich Jr., I read his column regularly. No surprise that he recently panned Obamacare — again — but what I never hear from Republicans is the Plan B, i.e., how we deal with the 40 million Americans...

  • Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

    Obamacare is a 'varsity stinker'

    OK, I can't help myself. Over the past three years, I have written at least a dozen columns critical of Obamacare (a.k.a. The "Affordable Care Act") in this space and devoted an entire chapter to the topic in my book "America: Hope for Change."

Comments
Loading
72°