Sign up today and save up to 83% on a Hartford Courant digital subscription
CT Now

Voter ID laws don't disenfranchise minorities and the poor

I am tired of hearing people say that requiring someone to produce a photo ID in order to vote is a form of voter suppression ("Vote suppression in Pa.," Aug. 17). There is little of importance one can do in our society that does not require showing a photo ID.

Examples include traveling by plane, giving blood, getting a medical diagnostic test, seeking treatment at a clinic, cashing a check, purchasing an item by check, picking up mail at the Post Office and having a document notarized in Maryland.

The reason for the photo ID law is to ensure that not a single fraudulent vote is cast in any election. That is a laudable goal, and it is not voter suppression.

One must wonder what the real motives are of those who protest and trivialize efforts to protect one of our most sacred rights and responsibilities.

Joseph F Greenbeck Jr., Parkville

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Requiring tests for voting? Seriously?

    Requiring tests for voting? Seriously?

    Letter writer Lyle Rescott not only wants to restore literacy tests on prospective voters but even suggested civics questions ("Voter registration should come with a test," June 13). So I have one for him, which is whether he is aware of the abusive history of literacy tests in the Jim Crow South...

  • Make voting an inalienable right

    Make voting an inalienable right

    Voting should be an inalienable right. If it is not, if there is any way to deprive citizens of their vote, it opens the door to systematic disenfranchisement of targeted groups for political purposes. That's why poll tax laws and voter test laws and property requirements have been discarded.

  • Voter registration is not the problem

    Voter registration is not the problem

    Even if we do set up an automatic voter registration, do you honestly think people who are too lazy or disinterested to register will actually take the time to go out and vote ("How about voter equality?" June 8)? Is this really the problem? Too difficult to register? Not enough people registered?

  • Voter registration should come with a test

    Voter registration should come with a test

    I agree that there should be automatic voter registration ("How about voter equality?" June 8) with two caveats: Voter ID must be presented at poll and potential voters must pass a civics test to have their votes counted. The test might require getting four out of five correct and questions might...

  • An election system ripe for abuse

    An election system ripe for abuse

    Democratic presidential hopeful Hillary Clinton champions automatic voter registration for all 18-year-olds, ending voter ID laws and keeping the polls open for 20 days of early voting — and The Sun agrees with her in the name of equity ("How about voter equality?" June 8).

  • Illegal immigration's impact on voting

    Illegal immigration's impact on voting

    Many of us consider the issue of voter inequality a contrived one conveniently politicized by the Democratic candidates during election cycles. The Sun's editorial board, as usual, shows how it idolizes the Clintons by failing to address areas of voter inequality caused by illegal immigration (...

  • Voter ID should be bipartisan goal

    Voter ID should be bipartisan goal

    I think it is way past the time to enact legislation to require a federal ID system because I never know if my vote in Maryland can be compromised by someone who is not a citizen ("Messing with voting rights in Texas," Oct. 21).

  • Forget ID, make voters pass a quiz

    Forget ID, make voters pass a quiz

    Rather than voter identification, I propose a civics test be given when entering the voting booth ("Messing with voting rights in Texas," Oct. 20). If you don't answer four out of five questions correctly, the voting machine is turned off.

Comments
Loading
70°