Enter to win every day in CTNOW's 21 Days of Summer Giveaways. Click here to see today's prize.

The stakes in Syria

Both GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney and former governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. appear to be totally ignorant of the complexities of the Middle East in the 21st century, and, indeed, of U.S. history in general ("The Obama doctrine: Passivity where leadership is needed," Oct. 14).

In the 1980s, pursuing a "contain the USSR at any cost" policy, we armed and trained the Afghan insurgents fighting Soviet occupation. These "freedom fighters," we now know, were the Taliban, who perpetrated some of the most horrific cultural and humanitarian crimes of the late 20th century and enabled the rise of al-Qaeda, which was responsible for the deaths of over 3,000 Americans on 9/11 and continues to kill American soldiers in Afghanistan.

In Syria today, another despotic dictatorship is being opposed by a heterogeneous coalition of insurgents that includes al-Qaeda operatives and other groups determined to take advantage of the chaos to further their own anti-American, anti-democratic goals.

In order to avoid history repeating itself, the United States must take a restrained, informed approach rather than the "shoot first, ask questions later" path advocated by Messrs. Ehrlich and Romney.

It is easy for a candidate to tell the president what to do when he doesn't bear any responsibility for the outcome.

What makes the stakes so high this time is that an extremist, anti-Western, Taliban-like state in Syria would share borders with our democratic allies, Israel and Turkey, threatening not only American and Israeli security but world peace as well.

B. Krueger, Ellicott City

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Syrian chemical weapons may linger [Letter]

    Syrian chemical weapons may linger [Letter]

    Are The Sun's editors naive enough to really believe that the last of Syrian chemical weapons have been turned over ("Muscular diplomacy," June 26)? I think that in the haste to find something to praise President Barack Obama for, you may again find egg on your editorial page. Remember the "red...

  • Muscular diplomacy [Editorial]

    Muscular diplomacy [Editorial]

    Our view: Syria's surrender of its remaining chemical weapons stocks this week vindicates President Obama's handling of the threat

  • Is Syria ready for peace? [Commentary]

    Is Syria ready for peace? [Commentary]

    Civilians are, but the rebels aren't ready to give up the fight

  • Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]

    Syria and Iran are U.S. foreign policy disasters [Letter]

    While reading the summary of key 2013 events, when I got to the description that "Syria blinked," I had to blink myself. I assume the writer meant "Syria winked." At least that's about as much attention as Bashar al-Assad paid to President Barack Obama's red lines — or maybe they were dotted lines...

  • Atypical images of war [Commentary]

    Photos and videos of chemical weapons casualties in the Syrian civil war did not follow the traditional model of battle scenes

  • Containing polio

    Containing polio

    Our view: Syria's civil war renews the threat of the disease's spread despite decades of decline

Comments
Loading

84°