Enter to win every day in CTNOW's 21 Days of Summer Giveaways. Click here to see today's prize.

Stormwater fees amount to taxation without representation

I received my commercial property tax bill and cleverly concealed with no explanation was the much anticipated "rain tax" section of the bill. I knew it was going to be ugly, and so it was.

I had already familiarized myself with the details. It was ironic that it showed up just a couple of days before the Fourth of July, the anniversary commemorating the Declaration of Independence from Great Britain. I was reminded of the Boston Tea Party, when patriots threw tea into Boston Harbor to protest the king's taxation without representation.

So just where is there any representation for homeowners, commercial property owners and non-profits regarding the onerous rain tax? It is a tax that exists as a result of a lawsuit brought by a relatively small environmental group, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, suing a regulation friendly Environmental Protection Agency to force a very small portion of the population to pay an excessive tax for questionable goals.

Here's the history as I see it.

First, the Clean Water Act was passed in 1972 by politicians long gone. Then the Chesapeake Bay Foundation sued EPA and the parties settle out of court agreeing to require Maryland to spend $14.8 billion until the plan is fully implemented in 2025. The public has no say in the matter.

Next, the state decides it isn't responsible for this huge outlay so lawmakers huddle on the last night of the 2013 session and decide to have the 10 largest counties bear the full cost. Of course, it was obvious they needed the votes from the other 14 jurisdictions, so they offered those counties a waiver for their vote.

There was no question that the administration and Democrats in the House and Senate were as pleased as they could be with the rain tax and the myriad of other taxes foisted on the electorate. The went home giddy that night. What a successful session it was. But I digress.

The 10 counties each draw up their own plans of taxation and implementation and levy probably the most oppressive tax burdens I have ever seen in my 62 years — and I follow such things closely. In Baltimore County alone the revenue will amount to over $33 million a year, with a yearly state total of $486 million. All of us will pay either directly or indirectly.

For the record I consider myself an environmental advocate, and I understand we have to address the problem. But why is it not being addressed in the other five states and the 14 other Maryland counties whose rain water flows into the Chesapeake Bay? The pain could have been spread around a lot more fairly.

If this doesn't create a tax revolt among Maryland taxpayers nothing will. I plan to protest the amount I have to pay on my commercial property and I encourage others to do so.

David P. Miller, Phoenix

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Hogan's 'rain tax' straw man

    Hogan's 'rain tax' straw man

    Webster's defines a "straw man" as "an argument or opponent set up so as to be easily refuted or defeated." We can find no better example than Gov. Larry Hogan's crusade against what he calls Maryland's "rain tax," which led this week to his introduction of legislation to repeal a law that he claims...

  • Rain tax deserves a real repeal

    Rain tax deserves a real repeal

    Boy, talk about a slanted, biased editorial ("Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater," April 2). An issue that, if done truthfully, could have been summed up in a paragraph was turned into a diatribe about how misguided the voters are.

  • Rain tax still isn't justified

    Rain tax still isn't justified

    Regarding The Sun's editorial on the stormwater management fee ("Carroll talks sense on stormwater," April 3), let's first explain Gov. Larry Hogan's position in my opinion. He proposed to get rid of the "rain tax," the legislature voted that down and proposed their own biased solution as offered...

  • Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater

    Carroll Co. talks sense on stormwater

    If there were any doubt that the drive to repeal Maryland's stormwater management fee, AKA "rain tax," is all politics and no substance, it was erased Wednesday when Carroll County, the jurisdiction that has fought hardest against the levy, balked at a bill to repeal it. That's right. Carroll's...

  • Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?

    Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters?

    I have always acted in an environmentally sound way in how I treat rainwater. I have never owned a house where rain water left my property. Why should I be taxed to subsidize polluters ("Miller storm-water fee bill advances in Senate," March 19)?

  • Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

    Churches should not have to pay stormwater fees [Letter]

    In response to your paper's recent article about churches paying stormwater fees, I would point out that churches provide heavily discounted space for community groups and that many house affordable kindergarten and nursery school programs and provide food and shelter for at-risk populations —...

  • Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

    Rain tax exemption not worth the effort

    When we built our house in Anne Arundel County in 2002, we had to install a $10,000 wastewater management system because we were building within 1,000 feet of a body of water. We found this to be unreasonable but we had no appeal. We were certain that we qualified for an exemption now from the...

  • In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

    In rush to cut taxes and fees, lawmakers are sacrificing long-term environmental sustainability

    I was disheartened to read that both Republican and Democratic legislators are already making plans to repeal the stormwater management fees designed to pay for projects that mitigate the only source of Chesapeake Bay pollution that is still on the rise ("After Hogan victory, local governments...