Sign up today and save up to 83% on a Hartford Courant digital subscription
CT Now

Compromising over shutting down the government would set a bad precedent for the future

While I agree with the notion that everyone in Congress should be out of their job come the next election, I fail to see the logic behind the theory that "both sides are to blame."

True, the supporters of the budget, mainly Democrats, are not compromising on the content. They are not expected to do so. In the legislative process, Congress passes the law, the president signs or vetoes it and the Supreme Court reviews its constitutionality. If it passes all those hurdles, it is a law.

The Affordable Care Act passed all those hurdles. It's the law. The Democrats don't owe its Republican opponents a compromise. If the Republicans do not like the ACA, they can either try to repeal it, something they've attempted some 40 times already, or they can attempt to amend it.

Which brings me back to my original point: Supporters of the budget do not need to compromise. It is their right to their own opinion on political issues — I absolutely disagree with the Patriot Act, for example — but I have never accused those who disagree with me of "not compromising."

I refuse to refer to the Republican party as "hijacking" the budget or taking it "hostage," because the problem is more nuanced than something like a hostile takeover.

However, accusing the system of ignoring fairness and resorting to what can only be seen as a clear breach of good faith with your constituents screams of bad politicking and self-centered abuse of the system.

The very act of striking down the upcoming budget sends the wrong message: that in order for something to be fair, it always has to go your way. That's a harsh and troubling precedent to set for the future of this country.

Jeffrey Malbrough

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Watching reruns in the Capitol [Editorial]

    Watching reruns in the Capitol [Editorial]

    Our view: GOP's heart isn't in another debt ceiling fight

  • Mikulski shows how budget is done [Letter]

    Mikulski shows how budget is done [Letter]

    With the proposed omnibus spending bill, U.S. Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski has provided the leadership that demonstrates how Congress is supposed to work ("Bill keeps government open, gives millions to Md.," Jan. 14).

  • Falling deficit an overblown threat [Letter]

    Falling deficit an overblown threat [Letter]

    A reader recently expressed concern over the federal deficit and faults the Democrats for failing to come to grips with entitlements ("Republicans aren't to blame for Washington gridlock," Dec. 20). He describes the state of our federal budget as a free fall into bankruptcy. In my opinion, these...

  • Budget deal is useless [Letter]

    Budget deal is useless [Letter]

    The latest budget deal is all wrong for America, and it does not solve our fiscal issues one bit ("Senate passes budget deal, focus shifts to spending," Dec. 18). It just kicks the can further down the road.

  • Balancing the budget on the backs of military retirees? [Letter]

    Balancing the budget on the backs of military retirees? [Letter]

    Let me get this straight: Capitol Hill, which is filled with $200,000-plus a year politicians — many of them multimillionaires who retire with most of their salary intact and only lose their jobs only if they get voted out of office — is telling our military men and women that they are the ones...

  • Republicans aren't to blame for Washington's gridlock [Letter]

    Republicans aren't to blame for Washington's gridlock [Letter]

    The Sun writes that those nasty old Republicans are up to no good once again ("Not another debt limit fight," Dec. 16). Instead of cheerfully following the game plan and increasing the national debt by several trillion dollars, Republicans actually want to do something to slow this free fall into...