Sign up today and save up to 83% on a Hartford Courant digital subscription
CT Now

Occupiers not up to tea party standards

As a tea party guy, I was offended by Susan Detwiler's letter ("Proud of the protesters," Oct. 11) in which she mischaracterized the difference between the Occupy Wall Street movement and "the [tea party] movement bankrolled by billionaires," suggesting Wall Street occupiers are more mainstream.

My wife and I marched in the tea party rallies in Washington, and we never saw a dime from any corporation. We got our notice of events through sharing e-mails with like-minded people, same as the Wall Street occupiers. We're not wealthy, so if we're not mainstream America, then neither are those occupiers.

There are differences. The tea party has a coherent purpose. We want smaller government. The occupiers want more from the government, including one of the most frequently stated demands — "free higher education." Of course, in order for the education to be truly free, the Harvard professors would have to donate their time and work some other job to pay their mortgage. Of course, the Wall Street occupiers don't mean that, so what they mean is that they want someone else to pay for their education. Yeah, and I'd like someone to buy me a Ferrari. I don't feel I have the right to demand it of my neighbors. The Wall Street occupiers have no qualms about making demands of their neighbors.

The occupiers also feel that the wealthiest 1 percent make too much money. This is one of the fundamental differences between the Wall Street occupiers and the tea party. We in the tea party look at that wealthy 1 percent and ask ourselves, how can I become part of that 1 percent, while the occupiers ask themselves how they can get some of the money that 1 percent has already made? They don't want to improve themselves, they want to take what's not theirs. It illustrates the biggest differences in our characters.

There are areas of agreement, however. We both loathe corporate bailouts. Maybe that's a good place to start. Maybe we can join together and remove the politicians who support corporate bailouts and go from there. The protesters also claim they want jobs. Well, believe me, nobody wants those kids to have jobs more than us, since most of the tea party members are gainfully employed and are paying the unemployment checks these kids are collecting. We're fighting the current administration, which we feel is not creating an atmosphere that encourages hiring. We're doing our best. It would be great to believe that these kids are doing their best to find jobs, but that's a little difficult to believe when I see them sitting on their butts in their little camps. Maybe that's something that makes Ms. Detwiler proud, but it makes me shake my head.

Fred Pasek, Frederick

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Occupy detractors must feel threatened

    Columnist Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. has certainly written quite a flamboyant article regarding the Occupy movement ("Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23). In it, he states a disconnect between them and the so-called "middle class," a catch-all term he uses to project his own identity. Most...

  • The importance of Occupy

    The Occupy Wall Street movement was created to make people aware of issues that aren't usually discussed in the mainstream corporate media: the greed of the powerful, the destruction of the environment, violence against women and gays and the perpetual war waged for oil and other resources, with...

  • Ehrlich carries 1 percent's water

    In his recent column ("'Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23), Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. illustrates the denial of economic reality in America that is continually propagated by the 1 percent. At the heart of his argument is the idea that the American Dream is alive and well, the happy meritocracy...

  • 'Occupy' is gone? We'll see in November

    Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column about the first anniversary of the Occupy movement betrays a hubris, a willful stupidity, and the usual threadbare deceptions ("Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23). Such are the building blocks of the corrupt edifice that Occupy seeks to dismantle.

  • Occupy movement got it right

    Former Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s column on the Occupy movement summed up the us vs. them Republican party platform (Occupy movement got America wrong," Sept. 23).

  • Conservatives see media bias no matter the facts

    The usual whining from the extreme right about media bias is evident in a recent letter from Stephen Sewell ("Sun lavishes attention on 'Occupy,' ignores tea party," Sept. 24). The writer is long on allegations and short on facts.

  • Sun lavishes attention on bumbling 'Occupy,' ignores effective tea party

    Let me get this straight: a spontaneous movement arises and takes up the name "Tea Party" based on historical actions and the acronym "taxed enough already," amasses a very large number of either followers or sympathizers, and literally reverses the party breakdown in the U.S. House of Representatives...

  • Occupy Baltimore: a historical footnote

    It's sad to see a good idea fizzle, and that's what's happened to Occupy Baltimore ("The 1 percent are winning," Sept. 18). But, the movement didn't just "fizzle," it committed suicide.