Try the new, improved Hartford Courant digital edition today
CT Now

Eventually, the Catholic hierarchy will come around to the idea of birth control

As usual, the latest dust up over the Obama administration's decision to require church-affiliated employers to offer health-care insurance that covers contraceptives at no charge has generated more heat than light ("Obama's 'accommodation' wins support in birth control debate," Feb. 11).

Both sides in this tussle have made mean-spirited, divisive and unfair, if not outright untrue, claims about the other side and its supporters. Moreover, some recent letters decrying the policy are really missing the point.

Virtually all Americans support a religion's right to preach and practice its faith. This would definitely extend to organizations that are directly connected to the religious institution and whose mission it is to proselytize that religion's tenets.

However, as I understand it, this ruling covers organizations that have a more public function. Hospitals and schools are open to people of all faiths. When you are admitted to or hired by a Catholic hospital or schools, they don't ask if you are practicing member of that faith nor deny you admittance or employment if you are not.

Perhaps people at the very highest level, the CEO or members of the board of directors, might have to pass some religious litmus test. But the rank-and-file employees, the ones affected by this ruling, most certainly do not. If a religion is going to function in the public sphere it should have to abide by the same rules as everybody else.

In fact, the administration regulation is little more than a tweak of a 2000 ruling by the EEOC that required insurers and employers to cover contraceptive services for women and made failure to do so a form of illegal gender discrimination. While that ruling has not been tested all the way to the Supreme Court, it has been upheld by lower courts and remains the law of the land.

Truth be told, many of the loudest opponents of the ruling are against all requirements that health insurance policies cover contraceptives and would prefer that employers, the insurance industry and the market determine what is included. What is being fought over here is really a proxy war over broader health care policy in this country.

What can't be denied is that controlling whether and when to become pregnant is perhaps the most important health-care choice that confronts women. It is good public policy to allow access to contraceptives so that women can make their own decisions about this most personal issue.

Even though they aren't there yet, at some point in the future even the Catholic hierarchy will come to that conclusion and realize that behavior that is practiced by an overwhelming majority of adherents even though it is prohibited by church doctrine represents no threat to their core philosophy.

Joseph F. Baker, Parkville

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    A recent exchange within your opinion pages debated the benefit of over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives, with a letter to the editor ("Sun wrong on OTC birth control," Sept. 16) citing the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as being supportive of recent proposals from...

  • Birth control in schools: Times have changed, and we must change with them

    Birth control in schools: Times have changed, and we must change with them

    The front-page Sun article "School birth control debated" (June 7) deserved the big headline. It is time for everyone to review the present and not the past. Thirty years ago, we would not have blinked an eye: Our parents would have said no to birth control; case closed. That was then, the good...

  • School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    It is the parents' job to teach their children right from wrong. At the very least, schools should not be making the parents' job harder ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June 6).

  • Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    The Founders wisely gave us the First Amendment so that the followers of one faith could not force others to live their lives according to that faith. They had already seen how religion could be the basis for so much suffering. The case of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Affordable Care...

  • Teens have a right to birth control

    Teens have a right to birth control

    As two organizations committed to increasing access to reproductive health care services for all Marylanders, we were glad to see The Sun highlight the availability of contraceptives in school-based health clinics ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June...

  • Little Sisters treated shamefully

    Little Sisters treated shamefully

    President Barack Obama's federal government has scored another big win in its war on religion in the United States, which used to be a nation under God ("Federal court rules against Little Sisters of the Poor," July 15). We should be ashamed of our court system as well as this "government" pledged...

  • Pills don't prevent STDs

    Pills don't prevent STDs

    This letter is in response to Susan Reimer's column about the GOP's attitude about birth control ("On birth control, young Republicans get it," April 15). I think Ms. Reimer's opinion is very narrow-minded. While I agree that young people often have premarital sex with no desire to procreate, I...

  • Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Readers Diana Philip and Spencer Hall were right to call out City Councilman Carl Stokes for his characterization of teen access to contraceptives as "a racist policy targeting African-American youth" ("Teens have a right to birth control," June 11).