Enter to win every day in CTNOW's 21 Days of Summer Giveaways. Click here to see today's prize.
CT Now

Selective memory on judicial nominations

The Sun has developed a bad case of selective memory when it comes to judicial nominations ("Judicial profiling," June 5).

When President George W. Bush nominated candidates for judgeships during the years that Republicans controlled the Senate, the Harry Reid-led Democrats, for the first time in history, filibustered several of them, including a Hispanic nominee for the same D.C. Court of Appeals they are complaining about today.

There was no cry of outrage from The Sun then about this shameful practice, nor was there any attempt by The Sun to play the race card, despite compelling evidence that the filibuster was done solely to prevent Mr. Bush from appointing a Hispanic to a high-profile judgeship.

What is truly shameful is that The Sun's sense of outrage seems to depend solely on who's ox is being gored, and its playing of the race card is despicable.

When a Republican is elected president and has a Republican majority in the Senate, I wonder how fast The Sun will want to see judicial nominees filibustered. As the saying goes, what goes around comes around.

If this practice is to ever come to an end, perhaps President Obama should nominate one or more of the judges that he wrongfully blocked from being confirmed while he was in the Senate. That would be the right thing to do, but it's also why it won't happen.

Robert C. Erlandson, Lutherville

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Democrats go 'nuclear' [Letter]

    Democrats go 'nuclear' [Letter]

    In response to Jules Witcover's column ("Nuclear option preserves majority rule for Senate Democrats," Nov. 26), I guess if I threaten to kill someone, but don't do it, I am still liable for murder charge. This is equivalent to the argument that the Democrats doing the "option" is turnaround as...

  • End of Senate filibuster marks end of equality [Letter]

    In the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence it specifically states that "all men are created equal." My fellow Democrats in the U.S. Senate did the unthinkable when they changed the filibuster (cloture) rules. They erected the ultimate fence in favor of Democrats and against the...

  • Senate filibuster threat is nothing new [Letter]

    Senate filibuster threat is nothing new [Letter]

    Your editorial regarding Senate Republicans has the usual complaints that liberals make about court appointments not being confirmed because of Republican obstruction ("Senate obstructionists run wild," Nov. 18).

  • A double standard on federal judicial appointments [Letter]

    A double standard on federal judicial appointments [Letter]

    Given the money that you want readers to pay for digital access, perhaps you can hire an intern to do just a bit of research before you print typically slanted editorials like the recent one on President Obama's appointments to the federal bench ("Senate obstructionists run wild," Nov. 19).

  • Senate obstructionists run wild [Editorial]

    Senate obstructionists run wild [Editorial]

    Our view: With blocked Obama nominations stacking up like cord wood this month, it's time to reform the Senate's dysfunctional rules

  • In the Senate, crisis averted — for now

    In the Senate, crisis averted — for now

    Our view: A deal to avoid the 'nuclear option' and secure votes for President Obama's nominees is welcome, but the filibuster still needs reform