Sign up today and save up to 83% on a Hartford Courant digital subscription
CT Now

Just say no to war with Iran

How fitting! On this year's Veterans' Day we're learning about the next war in the Middle East ("Iran and the bomb," Nov. 11). Now it's Iran that's in the crosshairs. In my opinion the Pentagon has become "too big to fail," and lessons from the recent banking debacles should be applied.

Americans were tricked into a costly war with Iraq, and we're still bogged down in God-forsaken Afghanistan. Our extra-Constitutional military action in Libya was unacceptable, and the U.S. "global police force" is obscene. When will the American people have the guts to say "Enough!"

Sadly, President Obama is in the thick of things — pressing China and Russia to intervene in the Iran situation, while at the same time reining in the war dogs of Israel. Most intelligent Americans should have serious suspicion when reports surface about weapons of mass destruction in an unfavorable nation. The red herring of Iran's nuclear bomb program needs to be seen as nothing more than a run up to the next American Middle East war.

Tragically Congress has sidestepped its duty under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution and has allowed the executive branch to decide when and how this nation goes to war. Furthermore, I don't consider hiding behind the NATO umbrella an excuse for military adventures. Anyone who has studied recent NATO involvements will find out it is the United States that always does all the heavy lifting.

Thank you, Baltimore Sun for "heads up" about our next expensive, mindless, bloody adventure.

Rosalind Nester Heid, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • The Libyan model

    The Libyan model

    Our view: Outcome of Libyan elections is an apparent victory for political moderates — and a vindication of the Obama administration's limited engagement there

  • Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Congress should have a say in any Iran deal

    Under normal circumstances, Congress should not get involved in preliminary treaty negotiations, since it has the option of refusing to pass the document by not mustering a two-thirds vote of approval.

  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Iran is not at fault for stalled nuclear talks — Israel is

    Unfortunately, the skilled Iranian negotiators have already won the game against a concession-minded P5-1 array of nations headed by the United States ("Iran's dangerous game," June 5). With funds now flowing into Iran and even more lucrative trade agreements being discussed with that nation, Iran...

  • U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    U.S. negotiations with Iran are a dangerous farce

    Having missed a July deadline for reaching an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program, the six world powers party to the talks -- the United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom and Germany -- have set November 24 as their new deadline. Iran says there will be no extension if a deal...

  • Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Regarding Ray McGovern's commentary "Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?" (July 20), much as we'd like to believe this is a good deal for the U.S., the facts suggest otherwise.

  • Iran's dangerous game

    Iran's dangerous game

    With less than a month to go before negotiators for the U.S and its partners are supposed to reach a deal limiting Iran's nuclear program, the talks appear to have stalled over Tehran's resistance to allowing inspectors to visit Iranian military bases and other sites to verify compliance with any...

  • Russia and China won't enforce Iran's deal with the U.S.

    Russia and China won't enforce Iran's deal with the U.S.

    Does letter writer Joseph Szot actually believe that Russia and China, Iran's potentially two largest trading partners, won't overlook any violation of its commitments — including halting nuclear weapons development — in order to continue unfettered trade with that country ("Iran likely to keep...

Comments
Loading
77°