Enter to win every day in CTNOW's 21 Days of Summer Giveaways. Click here to see today's prize.

Obama goes soft on Iran — again

After listening to speeches during the opening session of the United Nations General Assembly, I concluded that both U.S. President Barack Obama and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad do not take each other seriously.

Mr. Obama repeated his old empty messages and declared again, "Make no mistake: A nuclear-armed Iran is not a challenge that can be contained." The Iranian apocalyptic leader who has never engaged in serious discussions also declared again to the world his wishes to see the elimination of the state of Israel.

The fact that negotiations, sanctions and diplomatic efforts lead by the Obama administration did not slow or stop Iran's ambitious plan to build a nuclear weapon proves that Iran's radical leader doesn't even consider taking Mr. Obama's messages seriously. Iran continues to spin centrifuges, support the Syrian criminal Bashar al-Assad, the terror organization Hamas in Gaza, and Hezbollah in Lebanon also, promote terrorism around the world. Mr. Ahmadinejad believes that Allah has raised him up to "wipe Israel off the map" and raised him up to help Iran bring back the twelfth Imam who will help Islam rule the world. This belief is much more meaningful to him and the Iranian supreme leaders than Mr. Obama's statements.

After years of failed diplomatic process to get Iran to cooperate, President Obama had another chance on the U.N. podium to deliver a stronger message and let this dangerous regime know that they have crossed all red lines, but he didn't. He didn't because Mr. Obama doesn't take Mr. Ahmadinejad's intentions, statements and actions seriously.

Ziva Giliya, Timonium

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    Iran deal a 'Pandora's Box'

    If we believe that Iran will cease its nuclear program and its support for international terrorism after the agreement is signed, we are living in a fool's paradise ("Sen. Ben Cardin says U.S. negotiators got 'awful lot' in Iran deal," July 23). The argument that Iran will no longer develop nuclear...

  • Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Wishful thinking about the U.S. deal with Iran

    Regarding Ray McGovern's commentary "Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?" (July 20), much as we'd like to believe this is a good deal for the U.S., the facts suggest otherwise.

  • Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    Iran deal won't lead to a safer world

    In 1938, the prime ministers of the United Kingdom and France signed a agreement called the Munich Pact with Adolph Hitler. This act effectively sealed the fate of portions of Czechoslovakia.

  • Don't trust Iran deal

    Don't trust Iran deal

    In response to KAL's cartoon of July 19 depicting Republican hawks not trusting a peace dove brought by President Barack Obama under the guise of the Iran Nuke Deal, I have a two word response: Neville Chamberlain.

  • Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?

    Is the 'military option' on Iran off the table?

    If, as seems likely, President Barack Obama retains enough support to complete the nuclear deal with Iran, it will be largely because enough members of the House and Senate are persuaded by his argument that the only other real option is war.

  • Dubious benefits of Iran deal

    Dubious benefits of Iran deal

    Words matter. Because of this, I tend not to blindly accept what others say (especially those with political ambitions) but choose to verify and often do so by reading source documents. This week, there has been much travail with regards to a deal with the Islamic Republic of Iran, its nuclear...

Comments
Loading

80°