Enter to win every day in CTNOW's 21 Days of Summer Giveaways. Click here to see today's prize.

Don't be so quick to jump on the gun 'ban' wagon

One of the most popular topics for legislators today is restricting gun ownership in some form or fashion ("Guns: Old issue, new hurdles," Feb. 10). They have labeled some firearms as "assault" weapons and likened them to those used by the military.

I spent 23 years in the U. S. Marine Corps, and I have never heard the term assault weapon used there. The fact is, the word "assault" is not an adjective.

Second, only people who don't understand firearms believe that a gun purchased from a local firearms dealer has the same capability as those used by our military or police.

To put it in context, consider a car purchased from a local auto dealer. You can buy a car with a spoiler, magnesium wheels, dual exhausts and racing stripes that resemble those on a race car. But such a car can't hold its own against the true competition cars that circle the track on Sunday afternoon.

The battle cry of lawmakers seems to be protecting children. But law-abiding gun owners were as horrified as everyone else by the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting.

The problem is that advocates of banning guns only seem to be concerned about children who lose their lives to gun violence. Do they think a parent grieves any less when a child is killed by a drunk driver?

There has been a lot of legislation to try to curb drunk driving, but never once has it been suggested that there should be a ban on cars. There has never been an organization called Mothers Against Cars.

In fact, the people who fight for stronger drunk-driving legislation understand that it is not the car that is to blame. It is the fault of the person who chose to break the law by getting behind the wheel while impaired.

If you commit a crime with a gun, it's likely you'll never again be able to legally own a firearm. However, if you are found guilty of drunk driving, you may have your driver's license suspended for a period of time, but eventually you'll be able to keep your license.

Bear in mind that operating a car is a privilege, not a right. There are no constitutional amendments guaranteeing the right to car ownership. There are societies that live every day of their lives without automobiles, such as the Amish. They do, however, own firearms.

We live in a civilized society, but there are uncivilized people living among us. The fact is, evil people always have and always will do evil deeds. The vast majority of gun owners never commit a crime with their firearms, and they take safety very seriously in handling them. I honestly can't say the same about how car owners operate their vehicles.

Is it only gun owners who must make sacrifices in the name of protecting our children? Shouldn't all Americans be asked to do the same? Would you be willing to give up your car? After all, in the words of President Obama, "if it will save the life of one child, we must try."

Kerry Nelson, Lexington Park

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • License gun purchases

    License gun purchases

    Thanks to Rep. Donna Edwards for her eloquent op-ed on the need to do more to prevent gun violence ("Dealing with guns demands more than another moment of silence," July 7).

  • NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    NRA selectively interprets 2nd Amendment

    As sure as nine people have been butchered by yet another gun-wielding maniac, there will be an outcry for more laws controlling the sale and registration of firearms, and the NRA will again claim they are heroically upholding the Second Amendment rights of every American citizen by opposing such...

  • Do concealed guns reduce crime? Let's find out

    Do concealed guns reduce crime? Let's find out

    Despite expert opinions, statistics and moral condemnations, the debate on gun control continues. Until the law permits everyone who wants to carry a concealed weapon to do so legally, there is insufficient data to decide for or against ("How to reduce gun violence," June 12).

  • How to reduce gun violence

    How to reduce gun violence

    At a time when Baltimore could desperately use some good news when it comes to the prospects of reducing violence, research from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health suggests we may already have taken a key step toward preventing gun homicides — it just may take a few years for us...

  • NRA's paranoia is catching

    NRA's paranoia is catching

    The Sun's editorial reflecting on the National Rifle Association convention in Nashville is an important statement on how the NRA has devalued our lives and our society ("Guns and the 'permanent darkness,'" April 16).

  • Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    Guns and the 'permanent darkness'

    By overwhelming margins, polls show Americans support universal background checks for those seeking to purchase a firearm to help keep guns out of the hands of criminals and those who are dangerously mentally ill. Clearly, the last thing you want is for some paranoid personality, ranting and raving...

  • Fix the background check

    Fix the background check

    As inspiring and overdue as America's reassessment of the Confederate battle flag has been since last month's Charleston shootings, those who wish to truly honor the victims need to set their sights to an even higher purpose. Late last week, FBI director James Comey acknowledged that alleged shooter...

  • What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    What gun rights and marriage equality (should) have in common

    In the article, "A unique Maryland marriage sits at center of Supreme Court case considering gay nuptials" (March 13), Carrie Evans, executive director of Equality Maryland, is quoted as saying the following:

Comments
Loading

76°