Try the new, improved Hartford Courant digital edition today
CT Now

On immigration, Frederick defies the law

It becomes very obvious that the defenders of Frederick County's intrepid terrorism of all immigrants (not just undocumented ones) haven't read the Fourth Circuit's reported case of Santos v. Frederick County Board of Commissioners which stated that "lower federal courts have universally — and we think correctly — interpreted Arizona v. United States as precluding local law enforcement officers from arresting individuals solely based on known or suspected civil immigration violations."

It is my understanding that Frederick County wishes to continue to harass immigrants notwithstanding the result in Santos ("Frederick's folly," Aug. 11). Which means that by doing so they are now breaking the law unless they receive a specific grant of authority from the U.S. Attorney General to specific local officers.

And what are the chances that those defending Frederick County's brutal treatment of immigrants understand that immigration violations are not criminal matters? Or that any of the Frederick County illuminati has read the text of Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals (DACA) which was an executive order granting an exemption from immigration enforcement to those who meet its criteria?

The best thing the Fourth Circuit did for Ms. Santos was to remand leaving the door open to municipal liability (that means you, Frederick County) when its "policy or custom, whether made by its lawmakers or by those whose edicts or acts may fairly be said to represent official policy, inflicts the [plaintiff's] injury." I know Frederick County wants to be known for its blatant hostility toward foreigners, but if I read the decision in Santos correctly, it seems like they are in the process of spreading a gargantuan welcome wagon for trial lawyers.

It has become clear that on immigration matters, appeals to reason, religion, morality or even the force of law do no good to minds poisoned by xenophobia. But they can be hit in their collective pocketbook where it hurts.

Paul R. Schlitz Jr., Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • U.S. not alone in birthright citizenship

    U.S. not alone in birthright citizenship

    The local front man for anti-immigrant hysteria thinks it is time to change the 14th Amendment and myriad Supreme Court precedents to exclude children of non-citizens born in the United States from birthright citizenship ("Illegal immigration is costly," Aug. 24). He neglects to mention that the...

  • Don't cheerlead for foreign worker visa expansion

    Don't cheerlead for foreign worker visa expansion

    I am not comfortable with the H-2B foreign worker visa program, yet The Sun reported a flattering, one-sided report on its expansion, giving credit to Sen. Barbara Mikulski for "cutting red tape" to once again rescue her major campaign donors in the landscaping and seafood industries ("Md. seafood...

  • What is immigration costing Md.?

    What is immigration costing Md.?

    I read with interest The Sun's article, "More school money sought" (Jan. 12). The article notes that the superintendent of Baltimore County Public Schools is requesting an 8.7 percent increase in the school budget. In part, the increase is needed due to "an influx of children in need" and "to hire...

  • Let's show compassion for young immigrants [Letter]

    Let's show compassion for young immigrants [Letter]

    Maryland saw an influx of unaccompanied children from Central America this summer. Today, we have more than 3,000 of these kids. I'm glad Maryland is harboring, them but each has a sword of Damocles over his or her head ("Montgomery Co. is latest to limit immigration detainers," Oct. 7). As Customs...

  • Trump is right about immigration

    Trump is right about immigration

    It comes as no surprise that The Sun's editorial board has jumped on the anti-Donald Trump bandwagon trumpeting the usual racist label when they have no other legitimate counter argument ("The summer of hate," July 13). The editors obviously have not read nor comprehended the scope of the 1996...

  • Immigration and the English language

    Immigration and the English language

    Regarding your recent editorial on immigration, how can anyone trust the ultra-liberal ACLU and the American Immigration Council to provide unbiased, factual information ("A misguided view of immigrants," Aug. 18)?

  • Immigration standoff

    Immigration standoff

    There is something truly unsavory about targeting for deportation immigrant children — particularly those known by the shorthand of "dreamers" who were brought to this country at a young age by their parents — but that was the priority of House Republicans last week. Not all in the GOP went along,...

  • We need data, not guesses on the economics of immigration

    We need data, not guesses on the economics of immigration

    John Fritze and Luke Broadwater's article "Baltimore weighs in on immigration lawsuit" ("Jan. 24) does an excellent job of identifying some of the potential economic pros and cons of undocumented immigrants living in our communities. It discusses "a federal lawsuit that has divided state and local...

Comments
Loading
80°