Enter to win every day in CTNOW's 21 Days of Summer Giveaways. Click here to see today's prize.
CT Now

Free trade deals have cost U.S. jobs

During the recent Republican National Convention, the talking heads were all a twitter about Clint Eastwood's rambling speech and whether or not Rep. Paul Ryan lied about President Barack Obama's promise to save a GM plant in Wisconsin. We have now witnessed another choreographed extravaganza performed at the Democratic National Convention with more meaningless analyses by the beltway pundits. Rhetoric will not solve our problems, and neither party is willing to address the cruel reality that over the last 40 years we have allowed the nation's industrial base to be hollowed out to provide high corporate profits from foreign manufacturing by U.S. companies and low cost imported goods, which gave a temporary shot of economic adrenaline to the consumer economy.

A recent article ("Uncertain times for young mill workers," Sept. 2) states that there has been a 44 percent drop in manufacturing jobs in Maryland since 1990. This is part of the problem which produced the rust belt and massive loss of steel and auto related jobs from the East Coast through the Midwest and gutted the textile, clothing and furniture businesses in the Carolinas.

Our misguided free trade policies allow easy access to our markets by the Asians while they restrict imports of finished products from the U.S. Redundant Sparrow's Point workers in their 20s and 30s are looking at $10-per-hour jobs, which are half of their prior pay. This leaves them with the grim future of a much lower standard of living.

This realization is hitting across the nation. In southern California, average manufacturing wages have fallen from $28 per hour in 2008 to $22 per hour today. Over the last 20 years U.S. companies transferred technology to China with labor now averaging $2 per hour. With free trade, we probably will equilibrate at $10 per hour with a miserable existence.

Neither party is willing to accept that our free trade policy is the root cause of our economic distress. There are sporadic attempts at tariffs which will bring retribution in a replay of the Smoot-Hawley Tariff — a major factor in the 1930s Depression. There are cries of currency manipulation which only infuriate the Chinese Politburo. It is not in our interest or the Chinese to engage in a full-scale trade war which we will lose. It is not in the Chinese interest to see the U.S. collapse. It is in our mutual interest to reach an accommodation which allows both nations to prosper. It is time for our politicians to stop pandering for votes with partisan attacks and approach our moribund economy with something other than obsequious cliches.

Charles Campbell, Woodstock

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Republicans have eviscerated the middle class, and Democrats have let them

    Republicans have eviscerated the middle class, and Democrats have let them

    Dan Rodricks' column "Let's help the poor, but not close to home" (Feb. 3) was right on target. Yes, and Ronald Regan started the great disintegration of student aid, social services, welfare benefits and federal support for public housing and urban renewal which has continued to this day.

  • Lift the cap on Social Security taxes

    Lift the cap on Social Security taxes

    Reviewing the 2016 federal spending graphs that accompanied John Fritze's excellent article, it is obvious, at least to me, that 50 percent of the spending could be offset with one minimal tax increase ("What's in it for Md.," Feb. 3). However, no politician would have the intestinal fortitude...

  • A constructive idea for infrastructure, taxes

    A constructive idea for infrastructure, taxes

    As much as the $4 trillion budget President Barack Obama sent to Congress Monday is a highly political document giving his allies things to rally around and his opponents proposals about which to grouse, the spending plan succeeds at putting two issues of irrefutable importance front and center...

  • Mr. Obama's 529 brouhaha

    Mr. Obama's 529 brouhaha

    Rarely does a president flip-flop on an initiative presented in the State of the Union address as quickly as Barack Obama did this week. He reversed himself on 529 college savings plans on Tuesday, which was just seven days after his speech to the nation. Such a political miscalculation is instructive...

  • Free community college is a bad idea

    Free community college is a bad idea

    Free community college is another poorly thought idea from President Barack Obama ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan. 21). Am I against opening up the opportunity for many who cannot afford college? Absolutely not, but here is my concern. We already require K-12 education...

  • Obama's middle class 'help' is useless

    Obama's middle class 'help' is useless

    All we hear from President Barack Obama is that he is for the middle class. Well, I consider myself middle class. I am a retired homeowner, so let's see how this pans out for me.

  • Milking the rich is not a solution

    Milking the rich is not a solution

    I was saddened and disappointed to read The Sun's editorial regarding President Barack Obama's State of the Union address ("Mr. Obama's tax plan," Jan. 21).

  • Obama is a socialist, not a 'populist'

    Obama is a socialist, not a 'populist'

    President Barack Obama is a populist? How about cradle-to-grave socialist? There is no area of your life where government will not intrude, impose its will and dissipate any sense of individual responsibility you might have had left ("Obama turns populist in State of the Union speech," Jan. 21).