Sign up today and save up to 83% on a Hartford Courant digital subscription
CT Now

Time to re-think U.S. use of drones

Drones over Syria? Hold on! ("CIA eyes drone strikes in Syria," March 16). The whole business of drone strikes on nations with whom we are not at war gets murkier and more distasteful daily — and cries out for transparency from the Obama administration on drone practice and policy, especially abroad.

U.S. military and CIA attacks by unmanned aircraft have been going on for well over a decade now with little fanfare or even awareness by most Americans. And that's just as Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama have wanted it. Sure, the news is trumpeted when some al-Qaida or Taliban leader has been a "kill" by a targeted missile strike. The matter seems clean and efficient because no airplane pilot has been put in harm's way, and no squad of infantry has had to raid an enemy compound — with a probable loss of soldiers.

All of this might seem acceptable if we don't raise the inconvenient legal and moral questions attendant upon drone strikes. What international law makes it all right to send our craft over another sovereign nation, one with whom we are not at war, especially when it's to execute an un-tried individual whom we deem a "bad guy?" (Answer: none). How do those who target drones choose the locale of the hit, whether it be a residence, market, field, or cafe? Kudos to the American Civil Liberties Union for its attempts to get documents on our government's still-secret policy on drone strikes ("Court calls CIA's denial of drone strikes 'fiction,'" March 16).

Further, where's the public outcry in America about the women, children, and men who happened to be near the bad guys and who were blown to bits or maimed by our attacks? Who speaks for them and their families? After official condemnation from both Afghanistan and Pakistan, we have offered only pathetic apologies for the unfortunate loss of life. What has unfolded here is another chapter in the history of the Ugly American: death by remote control, far away.

A former CIA officer with Middle East experience is quoted as saying that in future the U. S .drones might target individuals to "thin the herd of the future insurgency." Of this expert — obviously a lover of hardware over heart in winning the war on terror — I would ask: Do you realize how many angry new insurgents spring forth from each American drone strike? The arithmetic is plain. Using these weapons, we'll never prevail.

Bruce R. Knauff, Towson

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Civilization has no place for drones

    Civilization has no place for drones

    There is no avoiding an international drone race; they should be banned like chemical weapons

  • Drone use must be restricted

    Drone use must be restricted

    On Wednesday, I was fortunate to have attended Medea Benjamin's talk on drone warfare at the Pratt Library. It's time Americans began to understand and speak out against the misuse of this technology. There is no basic problem with unmanned aerial vehicles, but their deployment and purpose needs...

  • Setting limits on drones

    Setting limits on drones

    Our view: President Obama's call to put U.S. counter-terrorism policy on a more virtuous path is an overdue step in the correct direction

  • Rand Paul's filibuster worked

    Rand Paul's filibuster worked

    Our view: A filibuster produces some clarity — though not enough — about the Obama administration's policies on domestic drone strikes

  • Obama made U.S. weaker, more vulnerable

    I must live in a different country than Sen. Jim Rosapepe ("U.S. stronger, safer under President Obama," Oct. 27). Unfortunately, my country has a terrible economy with 23 million people out of work. In four years, the price of gasoline has doubled, the average family has seen a yearly income loss...

  • Middle East mess was born in the U.S.A.

    Middle East mess was born in the U.S.A.

    American meddling in the Arab world has produced decades of disasters, so why are we still there?

  • The real problem with David Petraeus

    There are a lot worse things going on in our country right now than Gen. David Petraeus cheating on his wife, and one of them is our country's invidious use of drone warfare. The worst part about it is that we have been brainwashed to believe that it is an acceptable plan of action. The only television...

  • The law of drones

    The law of drones

    Our view: Despite Congress' efforts get more information about U.S. drone strikes abroad, details of the program remain as elusive as ever