Don't miss this: Last day to save up to 83% on a Hartford Courant digital subscription
CT Now

Having access to contraceptives and getting them for free are two different things

Letter writer Anita L. Feith writes that it's hard to believe that in 2012 access to contraception is in the spotlight of a national debate ("Standing up for contraception," Feb. 23). One reason Ms. Feith probably finds this hard to believe is because it isn't true.

There is no national debate about whether to restrict access to contraception. The debate is about whether contraception should be paid for in the form of handouts from insurance companies or the government, both of which would pass along the cost to all consumers.

By Ms. Feith's logic — that anything other people won't buy for you is something you're being denied — I've been denied automobiles, clothing and food my entire adult life.

Where I do agree with Mr. Feith is that in this age of entitlement, it's a bit surprising that anyone has the mettle to say no to paying for something that someone else wants for free.

It's a bit disconcerting that so often those on both sides of the aisle blur the lines of truth when trying to make their point.

Many on the right claim that 50 percent of Americans pay no taxes. That's not true, and it doesn't tell the whole story. Half of Americans pay no income taxes, which is a different thing altogether.

On the other hand, many on the left fail to distinguish between legal and illegal immigrants when the topic of immigration comes up. Yet the word "illegal" is germane to the discussion.

Now some folks are blurring the line between not having something given to them for free and being denied access to it. It's simply not the same thing.

Given the exploding world population, there may be an argument for government involvement in family planning, including efforts to increase the use of contraception and subsidize the needs of the poor.

But the argument can't be that we all are somehow entitled to have everything we want given to us for free, or that we're somehow being treated unfairly when that doesn't happen.

Michael DeCicco, Severna Park

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    A recent exchange within your opinion pages debated the benefit of over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives, with a letter to the editor ("Sun wrong on OTC birth control," Sept. 16) citing the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as being supportive of recent proposals from...

  • Birth control in schools: Times have changed, and we must change with them

    Birth control in schools: Times have changed, and we must change with them

    The front-page Sun article "School birth control debated" (June 7) deserved the big headline. It is time for everyone to review the present and not the past. Thirty years ago, we would not have blinked an eye: Our parents would have said no to birth control; case closed. That was then, the good...

  • School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    It is the parents' job to teach their children right from wrong. At the very least, schools should not be making the parents' job harder ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June 6).

  • Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    The Founders wisely gave us the First Amendment so that the followers of one faith could not force others to live their lives according to that faith. They had already seen how religion could be the basis for so much suffering. The case of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Affordable Care...

  • Teens have a right to birth control

    Teens have a right to birth control

    As two organizations committed to increasing access to reproductive health care services for all Marylanders, we were glad to see The Sun highlight the availability of contraceptives in school-based health clinics ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June...

  • Little Sisters treated shamefully

    Little Sisters treated shamefully

    President Barack Obama's federal government has scored another big win in its war on religion in the United States, which used to be a nation under God ("Federal court rules against Little Sisters of the Poor," July 15). We should be ashamed of our court system as well as this "government" pledged...

  • Pills don't prevent STDs

    Pills don't prevent STDs

    This letter is in response to Susan Reimer's column about the GOP's attitude about birth control ("On birth control, young Republicans get it," April 15). I think Ms. Reimer's opinion is very narrow-minded. While I agree that young people often have premarital sex with no desire to procreate, I...

  • Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Readers Diana Philip and Spencer Hall were right to call out City Councilman Carl Stokes for his characterization of teen access to contraceptives as "a racist policy targeting African-American youth" ("Teens have a right to birth control," June 11).

Comments
Loading
85°