Try the new, improved Hartford Courant digital edition today
CT Now

Whose freedom are the bishops protecting? [Commentary]

The rallying cry "freedom to serve" will soon be heard in Baltimore as the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) and its Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty launches its annual "Fortnight for Freedom" campaign tomorrow. If you think this is an odd phrase to refer to the demand that religious employers be exempt from providing contraception access for female employees, you're not alone. The refrain also rings hollow for women and men everywhere who, because of the bishops' discriminatory practices, are not free to serve.

"Sandra," who asked that her real name not be used for fear of professional retribution, took a pay cut to do the type of work she loves and became a science teacher at a Catholic school. She soon realized that working under the jurisdiction of a local diocese came with a hefty price tag. When she went to fill her usual birth control prescription, she was shocked to discover her new employer did not cover birth control, regardless of medical necessity.

Paying out of pocket for the contraceptive method that worked best for her, a nongeneric prescription, posed a significant hardship on the budget she had carefully planned with her husband. But Sandra especially objected to the bishops' interference in personal, private decisions about what her body needed in order to be able to perform at work every day.

Her story, unfortunately, is all too common. Although the majority of Catholic school teachers are women, their access to contraception is determined by the local bishop — who could not be more out of touch with a woman's health care needs. The bishops' intrusive rules also affect the female spouses of male teachers and all teachers' dependents, regardless of their religious beliefs. They, too, find access to contraception under the school plans to be anything but free.

But the bishops don't just require women workers to pay for their conscience-based decisions on their own dime. Sometimes they exclude people entirely.

Carla Hale was a teacher at a Catholic school in Ohio, where she served for 19 years. After her mother passed away, she included her same-sex partner's name in the obituary in the local newspaper. Someone complained anonymously to the school. Two weeks later, Carla was fired. Since then, other Catholic schools have fired workers for same-sex relationships, decisions that are now increasingly facing public outcry from Catholic parents and students who question why these dedicated instructors are not fit to serve.

Institutions — both secular and religious — cannot legitimately hide behind a supposed institutional "conscience" when they trample on the conscience rights of employees like Sandra and Carla. In both cases, their right to live according to their own beliefs was steamrolled by a bogus assertion of what religious freedom means.

The vast majority of Catholics side with Carla and Sandra. We overwhelmingly reject the bishops' teachings on contraception and their demand to use religion to discriminate.

What the bishops don't want you to see is that they are free to serve. The Archdiocese of New York has provided contraception for years — without complaint — to employees through the ArchCare Health Group. Catholic hospitals, schools and universities absolutely have the freedom to provide contraception coverage to employees without raising a fuss and without lodging a lawsuit. And yes, they can have humane employee policies without an annual two-week campaign that intimates that the services provided by the country's Catholic-run institutions are in any way linked to the sexual and reproductive choices made by their workers.

Any freedom that doesn't affirm the dignity of the many Sandras and Carlas who are the lifeblood of Catholic institutions everywhere is a poor freedom indeed.

Jon O'Brien is the president of Catholics for Choice. His email is

To respond to this commentary, send an email to Please include your name and contact information.

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    Where OB-GYNs stand on over the counter birth control [Letter]

    A recent exchange within your opinion pages debated the benefit of over-the-counter access to oral contraceptives, with a letter to the editor ("Sun wrong on OTC birth control," Sept. 16) citing the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists as being supportive of recent proposals from...

  • Birth control in schools: Times have changed, and we must change with them

    Birth control in schools: Times have changed, and we must change with them

    The front-page Sun article "School birth control debated" (June 7) deserved the big headline. It is time for everyone to review the present and not the past. Thirty years ago, we would not have blinked an eye: Our parents would have said no to birth control; case closed. That was then, the good...

  • School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    School birth control makes parents' jobs harder

    It is the parents' job to teach their children right from wrong. At the very least, schools should not be making the parents' job harder ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June 6).

  • Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    Little Sisters' employees have rights, too

    The Founders wisely gave us the First Amendment so that the followers of one faith could not force others to live their lives according to that faith. They had already seen how religion could be the basis for so much suffering. The case of the Little Sisters of the Poor and the Affordable Care...

  • Teens have a right to birth control

    Teens have a right to birth control

    As two organizations committed to increasing access to reproductive health care services for all Marylanders, we were glad to see The Sun highlight the availability of contraceptives in school-based health clinics ("Amid teen pregnancy decline, debate renewed about birth control in schools," June...

  • Little Sisters treated shamefully

    Little Sisters treated shamefully

    President Barack Obama's federal government has scored another big win in its war on religion in the United States, which used to be a nation under God ("Federal court rules against Little Sisters of the Poor," July 15). We should be ashamed of our court system as well as this "government" pledged...

  • Pills don't prevent STDs

    Pills don't prevent STDs

    This letter is in response to Susan Reimer's column about the GOP's attitude about birth control ("On birth control, young Republicans get it," April 15). I think Ms. Reimer's opinion is very narrow-minded. While I agree that young people often have premarital sex with no desire to procreate, I...

  • Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Stokes, like many before him, is wrong on birth control

    Readers Diana Philip and Spencer Hall were right to call out City Councilman Carl Stokes for his characterization of teen access to contraceptives as "a racist policy targeting African-American youth" ("Teens have a right to birth control," June 11).