Enter to win every day in CTNOW's 21 Days of Summer Giveaways. Click here to see today's prize.
CT Now

Free speech, downsized

It seems we have reached an odd kind of stage in the United States when the Supreme Court has ruled that campaign spending by corporate fatcats is permissible "free speech," but Dr. Ben Carson's utterances against gay marriage are considered impermissible bigotry by his employers.

I would note that Dr. Carson did not advocate punishment, imprisonment or persecution for same-sex couples; he only questioned their right to marriage, an institution millions of straight Americans have foregone in favor of mere cohabitation. In an age where the average U.S. marriage lasts only five years and I have seen English as a Second Language textbooks list the "benefits" of divorce (leaving the non-native students, as a language exercise, to come up with the disadvantages!), it is interesting that marriage is seen as an important civil right at all.

In an earlier stage of American history — roughly corresponding to the Vietnam war era — sharply opposed viewpoints in relation to civil rights, war, women's equality, LSD and space exploration were debated intensely across this country. People offended each other with their views, and yet rarely tried to silence each other. Has the Age of Obama sunk to a lower standard of freedom of expression?

Mark Chalkley, Baltimore

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Ben Carson's own words show he's ill-suited to office

    Thomas Schaller makes a strong case that Dr. Ben Carson should stick to medicine ("Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3). Mr. Schaller did not need to stray far for evidence: He cites Dr. Carson's own public pronouncements for curing the nation's ills, namely, his call for a flat tax which...

  • Carson should run for president

    Carson should run for president

    Columnist Thomas F. Schaller makes reference to some prominent individuals who failed to succeed in business, but he may be too young to remember that a shopkeeper named Harry S. Truman defeated a favored Republican, Thomas E. Dewey, in 1946 ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3).

  • Carson speaks truth

    Carson speaks truth

    Thomas F. Schaller's analogy comparing Michael Jordan's attempt to play baseball to Ben Carson's qualifications to be president is asinine ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Why don't we just expand that assertion to dissuade political science teachers from becoming newspaper columnists?

  • Columnist, heal thyself

    Columnist, heal thyself

    Thomas F. Schaller's piece on Ben Carson is nothing more than an ad hominem attack, an attack more appropriate to a blog from the fever swamps of the ideological left than a nationally-recognized newspaper ("Carson, stick to medicine," Feb. 4). Frank Kent has to be spinning in his grave.

  • Is Carson's race the problem?

    Is Carson's race the problem?

    I find it interesting that columnist Thomas F. Schaller can champion our "community organizer" president as all-knowing, intelligent and, of all things, competent, yet Ben Carson, a world-renowned brain surgeon and Herman Cain, a very successful business owner, don't have the ability to be president,...

  • Carson v. Obama

    Carson v. Obama

    How can columnist Thomas F. Schaller compare Michael Jordan trying to hit a 95-mph fastball to Ben Carson being president of the United States? Is he saying a community organizer was more prepared to be president than Dr. Carson ("Ben Carson should stick to medicine," Feb. 3)?

  • Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    Ben Carson's conservative approach to health care reform [Letter]

    I wonder why letter writer S. R. Cohen is so quick to attack neurosurgeon Ben Carson when he seems so unaware of Mr. Carson's beliefs ("Ben Carson commits 'values malpractice,'" March 16).

  • Carson is no 'simpleton'

    Carson is no 'simpleton'

    I am a 50-something, Jesuit-educated, Libertarian-leaning registered Democrat who has been reading Thomas F. Schaller's column for years. He has the luxury of at least being accepted around liberals and only being castigated by conservatives. Libertarian thinkers eventually are attacked by both...

Comments
Loading
71°