Try the new, improved Hartford Courant digital edition today
CT Now

Bush's presidency is looking better compared to Obama

In regards to "Misoverestimating Bush" (April 25), it's surprising that this complete nincompoop could somehow manipulate not only the intelligence community in this country but even our allies into reporting that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. The "liar" Bush, moreover, just because of a rapacious appetite for war, started a war knowing there were no such weapons and with full realization that it would make his administration look foolish and incompetent. Brilliant on the one hand and stupid on the next.

Where has the editorial board been since 2000? It was widely reported that even if the Florida count were conducted exactly as Al Gore wanted, George W. Bush still would have won. And the board is worried about the deficit spending? What's not mentioned is that President Barack Obama has caused the deficit to increase by 59 percent in only four years, has overseen the worst economic recovery since the 1930s, has embraced all of Mr. Bush's national security initiatives except water boarding, has demonstrated a level of incompetence in terms of working with both parties probably unparalleled in U.S. history and has diligently worked to divide America by practicing the worst kind of class demagoguery.

Mr. Bush certainly had his failures, but I've not read one economist who thinks the recession can largely be laid at his doorstep. The roots of the downturn were put down long before Mr. Bush became president. The bottom line is that Mr. Bush's presidency is looking better and better compared to the current occupant of the White House.

John Sandstrom, Phoenix

Copyright © 2015, CT Now
Related Content
  • Bush was a lousy president

    Bush was a lousy president

    I am writing response to the letter writer who stated that the policy of forcing banks to give loans to people who could not afford them was pushed by Rep. Barney Frank and Sen. Chris Dodd ("Stop blaming Bush," May 1).

  • Bush deserves the criticism he's getting

    Bush deserves the criticism he's getting

    When I read Stanley J. Glinka's recent letter defending the presidency of George W. Bush I wanted to laugh, but it was 6 a.m. and I did not want to wake up my still sleeping wife ("Stop blaming Bush," May 1).

  • The Sun's spin on Bush is never applied to President Obama

    I'm still holding my head after reading your scurrilous diatribe regarding historians' assessment of the presidency of George W. Bush ("Misoverestimating Bush," April 28).

  • How history will rate George W. Bush

    I had to laugh at Mark Ryan's letter about George W. Bush claiming that "the man woke up every morning and tried to do what was best for all Americans" ("Bush will be lauded by history," April 30).

  • Historians will recognize Bush's strengths

    Historians will recognize Bush's strengths

    I congratulate The Sun for grabbing the opportunity of the dedication of the George W. Bush Presidential Library to criticize former President Bush yet again ("Misoverestimating Bush," April 28).

  • Biased view of Bush

    Your view of the Bush presidency made for a nicely biased editorial ("Misoverestimating Bush," April 28). Now let's have its counterpart – "Misoverestimating Obama."

  • It's time to stop blaming Bush

    It's time to stop blaming Bush

    I am not a fan of former President George W. Bush, but I must comment on the hatchet job that was The Sun's editorial about the opening of the Bush library in Dallas ("Misoverestimating Bush," April 28).

  • The Bush library and the willing suspension of disbelief

    The Bush library and the willing suspension of disbelief

    The former presidents gathered in Dallas glossed over the unpleasantness of 43's administration, but history will not be so kind

Comments
Loading
75°