Employers in Maryland and across the United States face a deadline Wednesday that some may not know exists but that could prove costly if ignored.
That's when all employers will be required to use an updated version of the federal I-9 form to prove the eligibility of new workers.
The form appears to be short and simple, requesting an employee's name, address, Social Security number and citizenship status. But immigration and business experts say it's more complex than it looks.
Mistakes or missing information, whether intentional or not and which might have nothing to do with a worker being in the country illegally, can lead to stiff penalties. Employers can be fined from $110 to $1,100 per violation for failing to comply with the form's requirements, according to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. Penalties can be even steeper, up to $6,500 per violation, for participating in document fraud, or up to $16,000 for knowingly hiring an unauthorized worker.
"We've represented many, many employers that had Immigration Services swoop down on them, not because of illegal employees but because the paperwork isn't filled out right," said Carl Shusterman, a Los Angeles immigration attorney and former trial attorney for the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service. "They're fining thousands of employers on the one-page form."
Employers with even a single worker have been required to keep the forms on file for all employees since 1986. But government audits tended to be rare.
That has changed under the Obama administration, which has investigated companies more aggressively, Shusterman said. Government audits of employer I-9 forms rose from 250 in fiscal 2007 to more than 3,000 last year, according to data from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement cited by the Associated Press in December.
Last March, Congress approved updates to the form, which new workers are required to fill out to verify identity and employment status. Both versions of the form have been accepted during a two-month grace period. But starting Wednesday, the updated, two-page form, will be the only valid one.
"It's a matter of making sure everything is entered correctly," said Justin Storch, manager of agency liaison for the American Council on International Personnel, a trade group for engineering and technology companies with at least one international office. "One little slip-up here and there can open employers up to liability. It's important for all employers to know this new form is out there, but there's a good chance there are a lot employers out there who don't know it's been released."
Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center is one local employer that already has switched to the new form. Michele Sedney, director of employment services, said the hospital has been using it for about a month. She noted that other than some additional data fields, the new form isn't significantly different, though she says it now penalizes employers if they fail to use the proper format for entering an employee's birthdate.
Bayview's employment department, which is responsible for more than 3,000 workers, has staff members assigned specifically to keep up with the requirements and review the forms, Sedney said.
Other large employers outsource the handling of the forms. Safeway uses a division of a payroll services vendor, which checks the information and stores the forms electronically, said Gregory A. Ten Eyck, spokesman for the grocer's Eastern Division.
Smaller organizations that don't have large human resources departments might find it harder to keep up with new requirements, said Shusterman, who lectures employer groups on I-9 compliance.
But mistakes are common at companies of all sizes, he said. At one company that hired him to do an audit, he found mistakes in nearly every one of the more than 100 I-9 forms reviewed.
Mistakes can include missing or contradictory information or incorrect citizenship status. The form's language also leads to confusion, he said. A noncitizen U.S. national, for instance, means someone born in American Samoa or "certain children of noncitizen nationals born abroad." But Shusterman said he's found few people familiar with the term.
Employers also can inadvertently trip up in a section to review and verify documents used to prove eligibility, he said. Employers could be fined if a worker uses a falsified document, even if the employer believed the document to be valid. If employers overcompensate and request too many documents or try to steer employees to choose certain types of documents, they could leave themselves open to discrimination lawsuits, he said.
"Employers get so worried about fines that they discriminate and treat people who are foreign-born different than a person without an accent," he said.
Groups such as the National Federation of Independent Businesses have been trying to get the word out to encourage small businesses to be in compliance.
Beth Milito, senior executive counsel with the federation, whose member businesses average five employees, recommends audits of the forms, either in-house or through an outside vendor.
"It can be hard for a small business owner to keep up with all these HR, health and safety employment-related issues," Milito said. "If [an I-9] hasn't been completed, fill out a new one and date it for the date you filled it out. You can demonstrate good faith compliance."Copyright © 2015, CT Now